Light,Lazers and HF
 

On Sep 12, 2:41*pm, "Dave" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message

...

I await the day when a ham comes along with sufficient education to
verify or discredit the Maxwell/Gauss
mathematics but I know a ham is not around in the U.S. that can
discredit it.

of course not, we are all educated enough to know the proper relationship
between gauss and maxwell, and the fact that gauss's law is an accepted part
of maxwell's equations... and works fine just as it is without your extra
't' added to it. *it would take someone graduating from the warped art's
college of mystical electromagnetics with an advanced degree in
neutrino-anti-gravity-weak-force-jumping-particles to handle that proof!

David you have had every chance of exposing mathematical error when
the proof
was presented on this newsgroup site. Every point of rebuttal
presented was shown to be in error
It was not provided by me but by a mathematician skilled in the trade,
with a doctorate, working on a NASA project at M.I.T
who came to my defence and showed the mathematical proof. Did you
report the good doctor to the Dean of M.I.T. and NASA
declaring him unfit as seen by your eyes. What credentials did you
present on your own behalf to provide credibility to your
observations ?
Did you mention your finding was based on...........well.......well
because..........well because it was me that said so.................
well I don't have to explain it to you.....................I KNOW HE
IS INCOMPETANT!!!!!................YOU ARE A FOOL DEAN......

Light,Lazers and HF
 

On Sep 12, 2:41*pm, "Dave" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message

...

I await the day when a ham comes along with sufficient education to
verify or discredit the Maxwell/Gauss
mathematics but I know a ham is not around in the U.S. that can
discredit it.

of course not, we are all educated enough to know the proper relationship
between gauss and maxwell, and the fact that gauss's law is an accepted part
of maxwell's equations... and works fine just as it is without your extra
't' added to it. *it would take someone graduating from the warped art's
college of mystical electromagnetics with an advanced degree in
neutrino-anti-gravity-weak-force-jumping-particles to handle that proof!

Light,Lazers and HF
 

On Sep 12, 2:41*pm, "Dave" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message

...

I await the day when a ham comes along with sufficient education to
verify or discredit the Maxwell/Gauss
mathematics but I know a ham is not around in the U.S. that can
discredit it.

of course not, we are all educated enough to know the proper relationship
between gauss and maxwell, and the fact that gauss's law is an accepted part
of maxwell's equations...


No,No,No. I understand that Maxwell only used the Mathematics to
encapsulate
observations from about 28 contributors most of which were duplicates.
He never extended Gauss law of statics to express the mathematical
results that he came up with. Extending Gaussian law by adding a
radiator and a time varying field
provides all that Maxwell presented. On top of that it supplies
pictures where radiation can be
isolated and solved where as Maxwell only supplied numbers which
included the requirement
of equilibrium as stated by all contributors which is a reflection of
Newton's laws
all of whichcan be determined by transitioning from a static field to
a dynamic field he d.
Are you going to rewrite history?






and works fine just as it is without your extra
't' added to it. *it would take someone graduating from the warped art's
college of mystical electromagnetics with an advanced degree in
neutrino-anti-gravity-weak-force-jumping-particles to handle that proof!

Light,Lazers and HF
 

"Art Unwin" wrote in message
...
Are you going to rewrite history?

sure, i'll rewrite the history as soon as you write something that makes
sense.

Light,Lazers and HF
 

"Art Unwin" wrote in message
...
Because they are
including the "weak" force present in Maxwells calculations.
you think the 'weak' force is in maxwell's equations? please state the
equation and term that describes the weak force. do that and i will
personally nominate you for an emmy award.... i would say a nobel prize, but
i really expect to see more handwaving and backpedeling that is more suited
to a bad actor than a physicist.

Light,Lazers and HF
 

On Sep 12, 2:50*pm, "Dave" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message

...

You have to be the only guy in the country with a 2000 foot diameter
umbrella to keep your hair dry!

not quite, but i do have a 120' tall by about 250' long 160m vertical array
and an inverted V at 180' that will beat your shoebox even without the amp
turned on.

You were the leader in this ham group
that denied *the mathematics of the comparison
of Maxwell and Gauss.

on the contrary, i keep pointing out that Gauss is an integral part of
Maxwell's equations.

I assume you know how to turn on a transmitter but beyond that your
education is a great mystery.
For sure you never received a pass in physics of any sort and debate
with such a person is impossible

well, i did receive a bachelor of science and engineering in electrical
engineering cum laude from an ivy league university, but it was here in the
states, so that probably doesn't mean anything to you. *And i did graduate
from the u.s. navy officers nuclear power school, which at least in some
areas was considered equivalent to a masters degree in nuclear engineering
at the time. *but that probably doesn't mean anything either since it was in
the states again.

Yes it does. Navy recruiters were under so much pressure for nucklear
recruits that
all tuition costs were covered by the navy if the recruit promised to
serve.
When it came to graduation time they found out that the recruits had
not been tested for color blindness.
Pretty good gig for students but you had to work hard at school which
obviously you did.
Boeing by and large benefited from those errors by employing them.
What nuclear function did you serve in the navy or were you as blind
in color as you are in other things?

Light,Lazers and HF
 

On Sep 12, 5:20*pm, "Dave" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message

...Becaus e they are
including the "weak" force present in Maxwells calculations.

you think the 'weak' force is in maxwell's equations? *please state the
equation and term that describes the weak force. *do that and i will
personally nominate you for an emmy award.... i would say a nobel prize, but
i really expect to see more handwaving and backpedeling that is more suited
to a bad actor than a physicist.

Oh my! It is in Maxwells laws, without the weak force you cannot have
equilibrium.
You are getting a bit silly now. There was a guy in this group who
stated that the weak force was ficticious.
He must be a submariner to. All computer programs based around
Maxwells laws have it to if one wants to
account for all radiation but most just want to design a Yagi because
it is easy to build.
Art

Light,Lazers and HF
 

On Sep 12, 5:20*pm, "Dave" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message

...Becaus e they are
including the "weak" force present in Maxwells calculations.

you think the 'weak' force is in maxwell's equations? *please state the
equation and term that describes the weak force. *do that and i will
personally nominate you for an emmy award.... i would say a nobel prize, but
i really expect to see more handwaving and backpedeling that is more suited
to a bad actor than a physicist.

If you have an optimizer program I will identify it for you.
Where do I pick up the money:

Light,Lazers and HF
 

"Art Unwin" wrote in message
...
On Sep 12, 2:50 pm, "Dave" wrote:
What nuclear function did you serve in the navy or were you as blind
in color as you are in other things?

fortunately my eyes were perfectly fine and i served my time just fine thank
you.

Light,Lazers and HF
 

"Art Unwin" wrote in message
...
Oh my! It is in Maxwells laws, without the weak force you cannot have
equilibrium.

identify the specific term in maxwell's equations that incorporates the weak
force... no hand waving now, you have a specific question, identify the term
in the equations. they are published, pick your reference and identify it.