On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 11:43:56 -0700 (PDT), Art Unwin
wrote:

... and Newtons law of parity demands
that charges are moving thru the CENTER of the radiator thus
encoundering just copper losses.

Google fails to find anything under Newton's Law of Parity.
Which one of these is what you're talking about?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parity
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_physics_topics_M-Q#P
http://neohumanism.org/p/pa/parity.html

Equilibrium is nothing more than the enforcement of Newtons law of
parity.

It's hard to enforce a law that doesn't exist.

Drivel: I tried to write a spoof of your postings mimicking your
style of technical word salad. I built the necessary framework, and
added copious amounts of buzzwords and technobabble. However, the
result was unimpressive and not even close to the quality of your
pseudo technological rants. I'm truly impressed at your ability to
fabricate such rubbish and would greatly appreciate some clues as to
how it is done.

Hint: Numbers, formulas, references, URL's, and specifics. Lacking
those, you would be a philosopher.

Incidentally, equilibrium is implied in the various FCC exams. If you
lack sufficient equilibrium to take the exams due to intoxication, the
FCC (or VE) will refuse to administer the exam.


--
# Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
# 831-336-2558
# http://802.11junk.com
# http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS

On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 14:15:58 -0700 (PDT), Art Unwin
wrote:

What on earth does parity mean in the U.S.?
Art

http://www.livinghistoryfarm.org/farminginthe30s/money_24.html
It has evolved into the money that farmers get from the government to
NOT grow crops and keep prices high.



--
# Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
# 831-336-2558
# http://802.11junk.com
# http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS

Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 11:43:56 -0700 (PDT), Art Unwin
wrote:


Google fails to find anything under Newton's Law of Parity.
Which one of these is what you're talking about?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parity
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_physics_topics_M-Q#P
http://neohumanism.org/p/pa/parity.html

parity.

It's hard to enforce a law that doesn't exist.

Drivel: I tried to write a spoof of your postings mimicking your
style of technical word salad. I built the necessary framework, and
added copious amounts of buzzwords and technobabble. However, the
result was unimpressive and not even close to the quality of your
pseudo technological rants. I'm truly impressed at your ability to
fabricate such rubbish and would greatly appreciate some clues as to
how it is done.

Hint: Numbers, formulas, references, URL's, and specifics. Lacking
those, you would be a philosopher.

Incidentally, equilibrium is implied in the various FCC exams. If you
lack sufficient equilibrium to take the exams due to intoxication, the
FCC (or VE) will refuse to administer the exam.

So, look on the bright-side! Once you have proven Art wrong, you have
really done nothing at all!

We will still be stuck with the same mysteries, the same enigmas, the
same riddles! :-) Life would be NOT if not for the "unknowns" ... the
advances we can make, the riddles we can solve, etc. ...

Indeed, when I "run" a program to compute an area of a circle, the
volume of that sphere, the surface area of that sphere--it works! No
"error factor", no "pruning", no "adjustments", etc. Same with a
square, a rectangle, a cube, or for that matter, any polygon, be it 2d
or 3d ...

When I run "antenna equations/formulas", I get no joy. When our
"antenna formulas" approach to, around, 99.9999999999% of that
exactness, preciseness, we will be able to claim, "We are close!" ROFLOL

Until then, we will use the "Compute, then cut-and-prune-and-adjust
method(s.) :-(

But hey, if there where not such questions, inaccuracies and
"sloppy-ness", life would be boring -- now, wouldn't it?
another-straight-faced-look

Regards,
JS

Art Unwin wrote:

...
Cecil, this sounds like a regular poster David.Perhaps he is pulling
your leg with his nonsence
Art

What, this is not the "Pulling Your Leg Festival?"

Damn, it appears I have caught the wrong door again! Last time this
happened, it was a womens restroom, at walmart, no less :-( -- at least
this is less embarrassing ... grin

I have found this news group to be a usable answer to the question,
"What would happen if you accidentally entered the door to an
old-peoples/rest-home/psychiatric-institution instead of the forum for
the college lecture you were supposed to be at and in attendance?

Hey, it works for me ... another-straight-face-yet

Regards,
JS

Jeff Liebermann wrote:

...
http://www.livinghistoryfarm.org/farminginthe30s/money_24.html
It has evolved into the money that farmers get from the government to
NOT grow crops and keep prices high.

Jeff:

Every once and-a-while a poster deserves my undivided attention AND
respect; today, that poster is YOU! ROFLOL!!!!

Warmest regards,
JS

On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 16:47:54 -0700 (PDT), Art Unwin
wrote:

On Sep 16, 4:32*pm, Cecil Moore wrote:
Photons have zero rest mass.
a photon at rest, how droll.
Cecil, this sounds like a regular poster David.Perhaps he is pulling
your leg with his nonsence

We know that we can accelerate an electron to 90% of the speed of
light - it happens every femtosecond in one of any 100 billion crt
displays still glowing in the world. Some of us know its mass at this
speed. A question for the Newtonian philosopherz:
"What is the mass of a photon traveling at 90% of the speed of
light?"

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

On Sep 16, 6:56*pm, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 14:15:58 -0700 (PDT), Art Unwin

wrote:
What on earth does parity mean in the U.S.?
Art

http://www.livinghistoryfarm.org/farminginthe30s/money_24.html
It has evolved into the money that farmers get from the government to
NOT grow crops and keep prices high.

--
# Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
# 831-336-2558 * * * * *
#http://802.11junk.com* * * * * * *
#http://www.LearnByDestroying.com* * * * * * * AE6KS

Well you may have hit on it. I am an englishman still in the learning
of American.
I saw the term parity as being on a par,maybe that is where I am going
wrong.
The law I am refering to is that every action has an opposite
reaction, not quite the words Newtons
used but the reaction is on par with the initial action. If you are in
doubt look up Newtons actual words.
Parity is what I picked up on this newsgroup so when in Rome........
Parity means the maintainance of balance
still sounds O.K. but I will not use it any more!
Art

Art Unwin wrote:

Oh I suppose a search on google re antennas and equilibrium will get
you something to read

Nope, unless you are interested in insects, the above statement is dead
wrong.

tom
K0TAR

On Sep 16, 6:53*pm, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 11:43:56 -0700 (PDT), Art Unwin

wrote:
... and Newtons law of parity demands
that charges are moving thru the *CENTER of the radiator thus
encoundering just copper losses.

Google fails to find anything under Newton's Law of Parity.
Which one of these is what you're talking about?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parity
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_physics_topics_M-Q#P
http://neohumanism.org/p/pa/parity.html

Equilibrium is nothing more than the enforcement of Newtons law of
parity.

It's hard to enforce a law that doesn't exist.

Drivel: *I tried to write a spoof of your postings mimicking your
style of technical word salad. *I built the necessary framework, and
added copious amounts of buzzwords and technobabble. *However, the
result was unimpressive and not even close to the quality of your
pseudo technological rants. *I'm truly impressed at your ability to
fabricate such rubbish and would greatly appreciate some clues as to
how it is done.

Truth is stranger than fiction and what I am saying is the truth or
factual.
In all the years that I have been on this group nobody has proved me
wrong
with respect to radiation. If they had I would have apologized for the
record.
For myself I can run all of these people out of town on antennas as
they are all self perceived experts
bestowing glory on them selves in retirement to supply the recognition
they feel they earned in the past.
Find an expert for yourself and ask him the same questions that you
ask of me.
My statements are nothing special and nor am I
Art





Hint: *Numbers, formulas, references, URL's, and specifics. *Lacking
those, you would be a philosopher.

Incidentally, equilibrium is implied in the various FCC exams. *If you
lack sufficient equilibrium to take the exams due to intoxication, the
FCC (or VE) will refuse to administer the exam.

--
# Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
# 831-336-2558 * * * * *
#http://802.11junk.com* * * * * * *
#http://www.LearnByDestroying.com* * * * * * * AE6KS

Cecil Moore wrote:
Rectifier wrote:
Radiation has no mass ...

On the contrary, radiation is photons which indeed
do have mass when traveling at the speed of light,
which radiation does.

According to Einstein, anything with energy has mass equivalence -
especially photons. But other than that, nothing with mass can travel
at the speed of light. You can have one, or the other, not both.

73, ac6xg