Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
Rectifier wrote: Radiation has no mass ... On the contrary, radiation is photons which indeed do have mass when traveling at the speed of light, which radiation does. According to Einstein, anything with energy has mass equivalence - especially photons. But other than that, nothing with mass can travel at the speed of light. You can have one, or the other, not both. 73, ac6xg |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote:
... You can have one, or the other, not both. 73, ac6xg Yanno', when I run that "equation" backwards, and then again forwards, I have a real hard time telling the difference ... you suppose it is just our "perceptions" which create the difference(s)? LOL Indeed, this may be a plausible avenue to explore ... in that, our radio signals are neither photons nor waves ... well, at least during their "complete journey." Perhaps they "wink into mass" and then "wink into energy", we are just too slow to notice the changes! LOL Remember, there are/is those exceptions where the, final, truth may be stranger than fiction ... Regards, JS |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 16, 7:48*pm, Jim Kelley wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote: Rectifier wrote: Radiation has no mass ... On the contrary, radiation is photons which indeed do have mass when traveling at the speed of light, which radiation does. According to Einstein, anything with energy has mass equivalence - especially photons. *But other than that, nothing with mass can travel at the speed of light. *You can have one, or the other, not both. 73, ac6xg True, travel is something less than the speed of light Art |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Art Unwin" wrote in message ... On Sep 16, 7:48 pm, Jim Kelley wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: Rectifier wrote: Radiation has no mass ... On the contrary, radiation is photons which indeed do have mass when traveling at the speed of light, which radiation does. According to Einstein, anything with energy has mass equivalence - especially photons. But other than that, nothing with mass can travel at the speed of light. You can have one, or the other, not both. 73, ac6xg True, travel is something less than the speed of light Art - In what medium? Remember that the speed of light is different in different media. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote:
According to Einstein, anything with energy has mass equivalence - especially photons. But other than that, nothing with mass can travel at the speed of light. Make that "nothing with *rest* mass can travel at the speed of light". From an earlier posting of mine: "Photons have zero rest mass. Otherwise, they couldn't travel at the speed of light." -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Equilibrium in free space | Antenna | |||
Equilibrium | Antenna | |||
Gaussian equilibrium | Antenna |