| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
September 17th 08, 01:23 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
Equilibrium and Ham examinations
Art Unwin wrote:
On Sep 16, 8:44 pm, Tom Ring wrote: Art Unwin wrote: John, the danger in using mc squared is that it has not stood the test of time. Next thing he'll claim is that nuclear fission doesn't release energy. tom K0TAR Oh Tom! bound particles means a LARGE force binding particles together. Break them apart and you release a large amount of energy which you cannot destroy. With heavy water you have two bound particles, the particles themselves are weak in energy. But then you are trying to get away from the subject at hand in this thread. Want to start atomic stuff then start a thread and attract those who are interested in that. Think antennas and radiation Art Went right over your head at 30,000 feet Art. tom K0TAR |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Equilibrium in free space | Antenna | |||
| Equilibrium | Antenna | |||
| Gaussian equilibrium | Antenna | |||
![Tom Ring[_2_] is offline](https://www.radiobanter.com/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Threaded Mode
