Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Lewallen wrote in
treetonline: Owen Duffy wrote: A conductor carrying RF currents and immersed in soil behaves like a lossy transmission line. The bahavior depends on the parameters of the soil (amongst other things), so the effect is different in dry sand than in wet clay. Current entering the line will be attenuated along the line. . . Please permit me to amplify on what Owen said, because it looks like it might be interpreted. Burying coax in soil has no effect on the signal inside the coax -- the loss of the coax transmission line isn't increased. The lossy transmission line Owen refers to is the line made up of the outside of the coax and, for the other conductor, the Earth. This is the transmission line which carries the common mode current and the one which will be made lossy by burying the coax. Roy, one of the lingering gaps in my post was that I spoke of a single coax in a plastic conduit. As many readers will recognise, that is an important qualification. If you put the coax cable inside a metallic conduit, attenuation of common mode current on the coax is much lower because it forms a coaxial TL with the conduit. The next question is what is the CM current on the outside of the conduit, and that requires examination of the end conditions on the conduit. The other issue, is that people often install multiple coaxs in one non metallic conduit. If they are not bonded together, they may convey energy with relatively lower attenuation by driving the coax outers in differential mode. I recall a project where understanding the configuration of underground medium voltage and high voltage power entry to a comms facililty was real important in modelling EMP impact. A neutral screened medium voltage cable worked differently to three conductors in trefoil or flat. HV cables were invariably armoured, and the armouring was relevant, depending on how it was treated at both ends. In some situations, 30m of underground power entry cleaned it of EMP, in others, it made almost no difference (though still relevant in modelling). Owen |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current | Antenna | |||
Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current WAS rraa three-legged race | Antenna | |||
Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current WAS rraa Laugh Riot continues | Antenna | |||
Chokes and QRN | Antenna | |||
F.S. 1 Mh Rf Chokes | Boatanchors |