Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 7, 3:59*pm, "Frank" wrote:
"Frank" wrote in message news:hwjQk.677$xJ3.560@edtnps83... Link at:http://www3.telus.net/nighttrainexpress/maxwell_1.htm Click on "Next" for the 2nd page of math showing the development of the wave equation. Are you suppressing a 3rd page of math showing equal librium? *It must be there according to Art's revisionist discovery of Newton's laws for the Unified Theory of RF Fields. *... maybe the 7th or 8th page then.. 42nd page? No, Sorry Richard. Nothing about "Equal librium" in 1200 pages. 73, Frank, VE6CB To clarify the math, I have added some relevant pages to:http://www3.telus.net/nighttrainexpress/maxwell_1.htm Frank What is the name of the actual book you are quoting from? Time and time again we get a quote from books by some members of this group where it is then used totally out of context. As an aside I am not quite sure what your intent is to supply these formula. If it is to substantiate a point then I have totally missed it. Many thanks for the postings and efforts Regards Art |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|