Frank wrote:

...
I guess you mean "Two phyicists". Problem is they are not physicis:
No degrees listed, no university affiliation, no publishing list, no
professional society affiliation, papers not published in scholarly
journals therefore no peer review. Probably more that I have
missed.

Even where the three papers were presented (PIRT 2006)
looks like it would not stand up to too much scrutiny. At
that point I lost interest.

73,

Frank

Hmmm, that is sad, so very sad ...

In other words, your logic, education and reasoning powers make you
highly dependent upon "rubber stamps", and, unable to think for
yourself, reason for yourself, use high mental capacities--you are stuck
with dependance on a "USDA stamp" telling you the "meat" of the matter
is fit for you consumption?

You, certainly, must be the product of this generation ... this is so
unfortunate, when I was in college they taught us "how to reason", and
"how to research"--NOT WHAT TO THINK, HOW TO THINK or IF IT WAS OK TO
THINK ... I guess just like cheap crud made in china ... so has gone the
education given to this new generation ... perhaps you could complain to
the college who has turned out this "inferior merchandise?"

.... sad, so very sad ... :-( Best of luck, may you find better on the
path yet left before you ...

Regards,
JS