On Nov 16, 12:09*pm, (Richard Harrison)
wrote:
Art wrote:

"This idea of waves moving along with the current flow and various other
ideas put forward by book authors seems to be a never ending attempt to
provide substance(d) to long ago thought out bad theory which would be
disrupted if current was observed to flow in the center of a radiator."

The theory is well tested and good.

Authors often write books to inform. They are paid for their efforts.

Skin effect is a fact of agreement among the scientific community. A
proof is readily at hand. Coaxial cable keeps what`s inside in and
what`s outside out.

The best exposition of "skin effect" that I know of is found in chapter
27 of "Radio-Electronic Transmission Fundamentals" by B. Whitfield
Griffith. The 1st edition was published in 1962. It was republished by
Scitech in 2006. Art would enjoy and benefit from all 638 pages.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI *

Richard I have made my thoughts known on radiation as well as the path
I followed
that brought me to where I am. In the past 100 years or more science
has not come to a consensus as to what energy is.
Einstein seached all his life for the weak force which he considered a
major part of radiatiation which leads to a Unified theory.
Today there is not one book thaat can provide a satisfactory answer as
to how radiattion is created.
What I am saying that there are to many theories that are being tagged
upon one another leading to an incorrect trail upon which books are
being printed
for a individual generation. So I proposed to myself a retreat from
the books and go back to Maxwells laws plus those of the masters that
provided the information to him and then with an open mind looked at
it with the 21st century in mind and the information garnered by
observation as opposed to theory.
Present day science is all a buzz about Neutrinos, CERN and the Sun
which is in a continually burning state creating partly burnt
constituents.
Gauss has a law dealing with particles and I have an interest in ham
radio. It is therefore natuaral to me that in light of present day
observances
Einstein may well have been correct even tho not aware of discoveries
found after his death. Thus my concentration was on outside particles
and not the wave style theorem and thus eventually arrived at the weak
force phenomina which is in use in many ways on Earyth which can also
be subcribed to radiation. But saying is not enough so I have used
Maxwellian computor programs to design these antennas with good
results all of which are bound
to the edict of equilibrium which all the past masters adhered to.
Einstein was not privy to a lot of things that I used on my jorney but
many hams do
and can easily confirm my findings which are observables not dreams
that support Maxwell. Books cannot and do not provide an actual
journey that provides a trail without gaps for the generation of
radiation. I have by starting the trail at the beginning with present
day science in mind and not pursuing the mode of academics who seek
favor by piggy backing theories of those who have received award thus
shutting out a;ll other aproaches.
Yes my thinking is known and yes I think for myself with no formal
attachment to the books upon which my education started where it is
incumbent on graduates to continue to hone and secure futher
information for the next generation rather than the sole pursuit of
personal wealth.
Best regards
Art Unwin KB9MZ........xg (uk)