Displacement current
 

On Nov 23, 9:18*am, Cecil Moore wrote:
Richard Harrison wrote:
If Cecil were asked where a reflection occurs on an antenna or a
transmission line, I`d wager he would reply, at the same place the
impedance discontinuity occurs.

Yep, and if one impedance is infinite (or zero or purely
reactive), the magnitude of the reflection coefficient
is |1.0|, i.e. 100% reflection.
--
73, Cecil *http://www.w5dxp.com

Ceci
If the surface of a conductor is completely covered by precharged
particles
and is aprouched by a changing electrical field would it not it be
opposed by the
electric field pre placed on the surface? Would the difference between
these two colliiding fields
create its own opposing magnetic field i9n concert with the main
applied electric field?
If we are to account for the electric field applied to the radiator
then we would have to add the energy
lost in the collision! After all the collision forces are no different
to the energy lost if the field produced
by the resting particles was the equivalent to a resister.
When Maxwell uses an "=:" that is an acknoweledgement of a state of
equilibrium such that the energy supplied to the radiator
must remain the same as the energy plus losses entailed in the closed
circuit and the collision created losses that must be accounted for.
Would it not be correct to say the applied energy must be equal toi
the primary electric field created plus the opposing electrical
field.?,
Ampere assumed that the energy applied to the circuit equaled the
energy received not knowing tha tthe energy would split into two
fields and not remain as one. This collision energy must be accounted
for on account of the addition of the "=' ancd the same energy that
Ampere was aware of but did not consider it to be present.( Note for a
discharged particle to have spin on ejection there must be two fields
present)
The bottom line is Ampere was correct with his law because he was
unaware that another field was present and thus did not include it.
Maxwell faced with combining all laws such that equilibrium occures
which allows the use of the "=" was left to account for it and thus
satisfy Newtons law.
Thus the eddy current fits neatly into the law of Maxwell and where
the addition he made only became known at a later date by Foucaults
discovery.
Thus the Foucault current or eddy current did three t things 1 it
satisfied the laws of equilibrium ie "=" addition 2 he added an
addition that matched the units and quantity values of the Foucault
current in an exact form including the addition of the speed of light
unit that reflects an implied speed of the ejected particle and 3
proved Einstein correct in his assumption that the Weak Force was part
and parcel of radiation.
Now we see that the "interpretation" of Maxwells addition was in error
or an invalid theory which can now be replaced by the eddy current
addition
which concurrs with Amperes assertion that there are two ways an
electric field can occur.
In summation the addition made by Maxwell was his mathematical
intuition by stating that the energy applied equalled TWO electrical
fields and not just one which was subsequently proven by Foucault.
Best regards
Art Unwin KB9MZ.......XG (uk)

Displacement current
 

"Art Unwin" wrote in message
...

more drivel snipped

I thought you were going away.

Displacement current
 

On Nov 23, 11:41*am, "Dave" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message

...

more drivel snipped

I thought you were going away.

As I stated, I do not work for you!
I asked you to prove that the addition by Maxwell equaled the energy
lost
in the enablement of particle ejection, if you were capable. Obviously
you are not.
So I tackled it and lo and behold the jigsaw of radiation was
coimplete except for a single opening
and there was only one piece left. There was a drum roll and the place
was filled exactly by the addition oif the remaining piece.
The whole puzzle was turned over and there for all to see was a
complete piucture.
I addressed this to Cecil since he does not fool around and is
proficient in mathematics and stays in touch with his
Alma Mata. After all, if the jigsaw piece fits then you can;'t aquit
Best regards to the groupo
Art Unwin KB9MZ........xg (uk)

Displacement current
 

"Art Unwin" wrote in message
...
I asked you to prove that the addition by Maxwell equaled the energy
lost
in the enablement of particle ejection, if you were capable. Obviously
you are not.

of course not, since that concept is yours and is bs.

So I tackled it and lo and behold the jigsaw of radiation was
coimplete except for a single opening
and there was only one piece left. There was a drum roll and the place
was filled exactly by the addition oif the remaining piece.

so, state the new equation.... or forever keep the bs to yourself.

The whole puzzle was turned over and there for all to see was a
complete piucture.

so, publish it and claim the nobel prize. don't, and forever be called full
of bs.

Displacement current
 

On Nov 23, 1:56*pm, "Dave" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message

...

I asked you to prove that the addition by Maxwell equaled the energy
lost
in the enablement of particle ejection, if you were capable. Obviously
you are not.

of course not, since that concept is yours and is bs.

So I tackled it and lo and behold the jigsaw of radiation was
coimplete except for a single opening
and there was only one piece left. There was a drum roll and the place
was filled exactly by the addition oif the remaining piece.

so, state the new equation.... or forever keep the bs to yourself.

The whole puzzle was turned over and there for all to see was a
complete piucture.

so, publish it and claim the nobel prize. *don't, and forever be called full
of bs.

David and others, ham radio has always stated that we lead the field
in innovation
and public servie. What I have stated is a huge step forward in
science which solidifies our hobby.
Now we are at the point that all hams join the band wagon or place
hurdles to halt the advance
which puts into question the need for their existance. There are
plenty of people in the world that are quite clever
and work in academics. Some people in this world consider ham radio as
just a bunch of CB ers like KB9.......
and others who post on this group. If as I think I am correct in my
analysis you may be still alive to answer for your silliness.
Many others can continue to deny change and they will probably move on
to the next worlkd because of their age before change comes along
and probably "rest in peace". But you and some others could well have
an epitaph on your grave based on the history of this newsgroup
that" here lies an obstructionist to change in life but succumbed to
it in death.":
Art Unwin KB9MZ.......XG....(uk)

Displacement current
 

"Art Unwin" wrote in message
...
On Nov 23, 1:56 pm, "Dave" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message

Some people in this world consider ham radio as
just a bunch of CB ers like KB9.......

like kb9mz?

Displacement current
 

On Nov 23, 2:49*pm, "Dave" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message

...
On Nov 23, 1:56 pm, "Dave" wrote:

"Art Unwin" wrote in message

Some people in this world consider ham radio as
just a bunch of CB ers like KB9.......

like kb9mz?

David, you represent the teachings of your professor of some 50 years
ago.
He is probably dead now and replaced in academia by people who
represent the best in science of to day
Thus you and many others have a disparity in science knowledge because
you stopped the regimen of continuos study and opted for the
pursuit of money. Naturaly those who maintained their inquisitiveness
and stayed attached to education circles will leave you behind in
education
where you would gain by attaining riches. Eventually you will be
replaced by those who do not dwell in the past that are younger and up
to date.
This is just a fact of life that happens every day in industry as the
recognition that experiences that are repetitive are just that, a
single experience, which is trumped by an open mind withouty
experience that is a fit in the modern world.

Displacement current
 

"Art Unwin" wrote in message
...
David, you represent the teachings of your professor of some 50 years
ago.

unlike you art, I am not an old codger. keep on with your senile rants and
delusions... they keep me in stitches here!

Displacement current
 

Art Unwin wrote:
On Nov 23, 9:18 am, Cecil Moore wrote:
Richard Harrison wrote:
If Cecil were asked where a reflection occurs on an antenna or a
transmission line, I`d wager he would reply, at the same place the
impedance discontinuity occurs.
Yep, and if one impedance is infinite (or zero or purely
reactive), the magnitude of the reflection coefficient
is |1.0|, i.e. 100% reflection.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Ceci
If the surface of a conductor is completely covered by precharged
particles
and is aprouched by a changing electrical field would it not it be
opposed by the
electric field pre placed on the surface? Would the difference between
...
Best regards
Art Unwin KB9MZ.......XG (uk)

When we return to college, get a job in the physics lab, become friends
with the head of the department, etc. ... we will pose your question,
and suggest an experiment(s) to explore all this ...

In the meantime, GET REAL!

Regards,
JS

Displacement current
 

On Nov 24, 12:21*am, John Smith wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
On Nov 23, 9:18 am, Cecil Moore wrote:
Richard Harrison wrote:
If Cecil were asked where a reflection occurs on an antenna or a
transmission line, I`d wager he would reply, at the same place the
impedance discontinuity occurs.
Yep, and if one impedance is infinite (or zero or purely
reactive), the magnitude of the reflection coefficient
is |1.0|, i.e. 100% reflection.
--
73, Cecil *http://www.w5dxp.com

Ceci
If the surface of a conductor is completely covered by precharged
particles
and is aprouched by a changing electrical field would it not it be
opposed by the
electric field pre placed on the surface? Would the difference between
*...
Best regards
Art Unwin KB9MZ.......XG (uk)

When we return to college, get a job in the physics lab, become friends
with the head of the department, etc. ... we will pose your question,
and suggest an experiment(s) to explore all this ...

In the meantime, GET REAL!

Regards,
JS

John
Academia does not accept studies from outside the club. The same goes
for the IEE and the IEEE
and ofcourse QST,radcom and the like. The internet is full of stories
where certain institutions have basically censored free speech for
years an action that is now continually exposed because of the
available of the Internet .I know it wears on the nerves on people
when I keep on hammering the point home= but it does find a place in
the record
But a long time ago this group stated that they would put down all old
wives tales. Problem was that many then took on the mantle of a pseudo
experts
which led to strong and petty auguments to real experts who passed by
and never stayed for long. So I took them on without backing down when
I had control of the facts knowing full well eventually they would be
seenj for what they really are by those passing by. I think that now I
have beat the naysayers into the ground where the facts provided
cannot be defeated unless existing laws were mangled in the effort.
Everybody on this group should now have a full understanding of what
my investigation provided whether they believe it or not or like it or
not. Nobody pointed out any conflict with present day laws which they
would have jumped on if they were aware of them so I am now satisfied
I have achieved my object of showing to all their true colours so
basically I am done.
At the moment I am finishing up a new antenna of some 20 foot long
with a dish reflector in the hope of attaining a rifle shot type of
directive antenna.
Since my tower at the moment is limited to a 30 foot height I will be
looking more at 20 M rather than the top band even tho it will be
operable on that band
I am also adding with the hope it will work, an automatic tuning
system as part of the antenna which will really push things to the
limit. Scaled optimized computor studies show that the antenna has
good gain but it is very difficult to narrow the beam width on more
than a few frequencies which I am sure the closeness to ground will
cloud the issue.
Best regards
Art Unwin...KB9MZ.......xg (uk)