Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:33:08 -0800 (PST), Art Unwin
wrote: he overlooked the term requilibrium From Maxwell himself (with correct spelling): "About the beginning of this century, the properties of bodies were investigated by several distinguished French mathematicians on the hypothesis that they are systems of molecules in equilibrium. The somewhat unsatisfactory nature of the results of these investigations produced, especially in this country, a reaction in favour of the opposite method of treating bodies as if they were, so far at least as our experiments are concerned, truly continuous. This method, in the hands of Green, Stokes, and others, has led to results, the value of which does not at all depend on what theory we adopt as to the ultimate constitution of bodies." It would appear that equilibrium (by any variant of spelling) is: 1. French; 2. unsatisfactory; 3. a poorer relation to continuous (i.e. employing time which equilibrium does not). 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current | Antenna | |||
Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current WAS rraa three-legged race | Antenna | |||
Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current WAS rraa Laugh Riot continues | Antenna | |||
What is displacement current? | Antenna | |||
Will displacement current form a close loop ? | Antenna |