Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roy Lewallen" wrote
With EZNEC, you have to use the near field analysis to include the ground wave; direct ground wave analysis isn't included in EZNEC because (etc). _________ After the comments of Richard Clark and you, Roy, I attempted to use EZNEC to determine the ground wave (see link below). The near-field analysis of EZNEC for radiation in the horizontal plane at a point 1 km from a 1/4-wave monopole having two ohms in series with a Mininec r-f ground, while radiating 1 kW over an earth conductivity of 8 mS/m is shown as 72 mV/m. The same setup when analyzed using the FCC's radiation efficiency for this monopole height, and their propagation charts for these conditions shows about 295 mV/m as the result, which value is supported by the measured performance of real-world AM broadcast stations, and is also a value in a range that could be expected from the BL&E data. Hopefully you or Richard Clark can tell me the reason(s) for this difference, which could easily be my own setup of the NEC model. Roy, would you mind posting the ground wave value EZNEC Pro reports for these conditions? http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h8...FldExample.gif RF |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Elevation Patterns of Ground Mounted Vertical Monopoles | Antenna | |||
FS: Hy-Gain AV-640 Vertical (Mint) | Swap | |||
Vertical ant gain vs No radials | Antenna | |||
FS: Hy-Gain AV-640 Vertical (Mint) | Swap | |||
1/4 wave vertical vs. loaded vertical | Antenna |