Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 29, 1:10*pm, Roy Lewallen wrote:
As you can see, you can get reasonably good results using EZNEC+ and near field analysis, although the vast majority of people this intensely interested in the mechanisms of AM broadcasting aren't hobbyists but rather professional engineers who are using EZNEC Pro/4. ________ Thanks very much for your numbers and comments, Roy. I would never have thought to try to use EZNEC near-field analysis to compute the groundwave if I hadn't read the suggestion to do so in this thread. That was my first, and will be my last attempt at that. When I need to calculate the MW ground wave for a particular distance, monopole height, frequency and ground conductivity I use the FCC method of first determining the inverse distance field of the radiator at 1 km for 1 kW of radiated power, and then using that value in a program I have with the FCC's MW propagation curves in digitized form. My point when starting this thread was to show that the elevation pattern radiation actually launched by vertical monopoles on any frequency does not have a zero/very low relative amplitude at/near the horizontal plane, which from what I read on these NGs seems to be a popular belief. RF |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Elevation Patterns of Ground Mounted Vertical Monopoles | Antenna | |||
FS: Hy-Gain AV-640 Vertical (Mint) | Swap | |||
Vertical ant gain vs No radials | Antenna | |||
FS: Hy-Gain AV-640 Vertical (Mint) | Swap | |||
1/4 wave vertical vs. loaded vertical | Antenna |