Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 5, 2:10 am, Richard Clark wrote:
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 21:59:34 -0800 (PST), Ginu wrote: anyone? You appear to be contradicting yourself:P_required... translates to a transmit power of 1 mW. ... However, 1mW happens to be the maximum transmit power However? As for: I hope my math is clear. If your conclusions for these case tests depart from rational expectations; then you have one of two possibilites: 1. Your math may be clear, but wholly invalid (transcription error of complex formulas into ascii text is a bummer); b. Your math may be clear or murky, and otherwise entirely correct, but you did it wrong. iii. You suffer from transcription AND "plug-n-chug" errors; four. Zigbee technology doesn't work. If this is a classroom problem, you need to resolve it yourself. If this is an engineering problem, what did the Zigbee help-line offer? There's probably a simple nomograph posted at their website or in their application notes. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC This isn't a classroom problem. It is a research study that I am conducting. For the first case, I used a distance of 500 metres, which corresponded to what happens to be the maximum allowed power of 1 mW. Hence, I stated that I may be having a range issue because I was testing the maximum distance case. That is why I provided a case for 300 metres as well. If I'm doing something incorrectly, this is why I posted this question to the board. Stating that my math may just be wrong, doesn't really help the situation. I will check into the Zigbee forums thank you. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Field strength / power / path loss calculator | Antenna | |||
UHF penetration & path loss Q: | Antenna | |||
Scanner sensitivity and path loss? | Antenna | |||
Scanner sensitivity and path loss? | Antenna | |||
Antenna Confusion | Shortwave |