Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ginu" wrote in message ... On Dec 5, 6:10 am, Bob Bob wrote: So at 5AM I may not be too sharp... The formula you used doesnt seem to allow for the required demod s/n. QAM64 for example (from memory) is around 30dB so this has to be "added" to the path loss. Differing mod/demod/FEC have differing margin requirmeents. Somewhere in there too you have to stipulate the bit loss rate "allowed". Can you explain this further please? http://www.satsig.net/lnb/ebno-calculator.htm is one of many sites dealing with considerations of Energy Per Bit to Noise Density Ratio, which may help you. The Eb/No -- or to some, Eb/N0 -- influences the bit error rate (BER). Let the Eb/No go too low and the link is not error-free. Generally, a BER of better than one error in ten-to-the-eighth bits is considered to be an error-free link. Navy satellite data links of my acquaintance usually ran at 256 kbps and, if memory serves, needed an Eb/No around 8. The modem reported the Eb/No and that value was the first thing we looked at if the mux started taking hits. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Field strength / power / path loss calculator | Antenna | |||
UHF penetration & path loss Q: | Antenna | |||
Scanner sensitivity and path loss? | Antenna | |||
Scanner sensitivity and path loss? | Antenna | |||
Antenna Confusion | Shortwave |