Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 23, 4:43*pm, (Richard Harrison)
wrote: Art wrote: "David just for the record, skin depth is proportional to frequency----." Not exactly. Skin depth is inversely proportional to the square root of the frequency. For example at 1 Hz the skin depth is about 2.6 in. in copper. At 10 Hz. it is about 0.826 in. and at 100 Hz the depth is about 0.260 in. and at 1000 Hz the depth is 0.0826 in. etc. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI Yes, I should have used "varied" instead of "proportional" But the essence of the posting is still correct namely, it is false to state that the skin effect always penetrate thro out the conductor as is the statement that a current cannot travel thru the center of a conductor where the material is devoid of eddy currents but enclosedn by a eddy current shield This is not to say that with a applied AC current such a route is chosen as I previously thought Art |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tilted radiator | Antenna | |||
Circuitry of a radiator | Antenna | |||
internal antenna current flow | Antenna | |||
Mechanics of AC current flow - ? | Antenna | |||
KB9RQZ: WHY DO YOU PERPETUATE LIES AND DISHONESTY IN THE FACE OF GOOGLE ARCHIVES TO THE CONTRARY? | Policy |