| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jan 20, 5:37*pm, "Spin" wrote:
So in receiving the AM BCB frequencies in *the united states, a vertical antenna is 'generally' preferable over a horizontal antenna? The above is based on having a receiver without any internal antenna. If an AM BCB receiver has NO internal antenna, then almost ANY external antenna will improve its AM BCB performance. The greatest improvement in that performance will be achieved when the intrinsic E or H gain of the receiving antenna matches that of the radiated EM wave (in the US, or elsewhere). RF |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Richard Fry wrote:
. . . The greatest improvement in that performance will be achieved when the intrinsic E or H gain of the receiving antenna matches that of the radiated EM wave (in the US, or elsewhere). What's "intrinsic E or H gain"? In what way does it differ from gain calculated relative to an isotropic source? How does one calculate the gain of an EM wave? Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Patch antenna Polarization? | Antenna | |||
| Rotation of the polarization question | Antenna | |||
| Very deep question regarding true polarization | Antenna | |||
| Question about VHF/UHF yagi polarization | Scanner | |||
| What is the polarization of Inverted V ANTENNA | CB | |||