Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 31, 5:01*am, Ian Jackson
wrote: In message , Chevy454 writes In message , dave writes But why the trunk lid? Surely the roof is better? On a vehicle, every inch above the ground helps. The car is being used for 2M fox hunting. *The Doppler antennas are on the roof. *The MFJ-1728B is on the trunk lid. Are you saying that the 6 dB gain of this antenna is not high enough for a 20 degree tilt to make a difference? Ken KC2JDY Noted about the roof already being occupied. Obviously, if the antenna is 'leaning backwards' at 20 degrees, the radiation in the forward direction is going to point upwards more than it would if ie was vertical and, of course, to the rear, the radiation will point more downwards. However, even with the antenna dead vertical, the shape of the body of the vehicle will distort the radiation pattern considerably. I've had a quick Google, and this is one site which provides some info: http://www.k6mhe.com/files/mobile_vhf_ant.pdf There will be lots of others. This also might be of interest: http://74.125.77.132/search?q=cache:...st.com.au/Ante nnas/overview.html+antenna%2Bradiation%2B%225/8+wavelength%22&hl=en&ct=cl nk&cd=25&gl=uk As I said, you probably won't notice much difference between vertical and 20 degrees. But the only way to find out will be to try it. -- Ian I think I remember from some place that tilting a vertical monopole operating against a counterpoise increases the take off angle in both the direction it is tilted and the direction opposite. I welcome correction if I am in error. Jimmie |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Capacitive coupling of magmount | Antenna | |||
Bend in xmission line | Antenna | |||
Dave ahs gone round the bend no religion that does not follow chrsitian teaching is allowed | Policy | |||
Drill vs. MagMount ?? | Antenna | |||
FS:NMO 5' MAGMOUNT WITH COAX | Swap |