Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article tonline, Roy
Lewallen wrote: It sounds like the model of the pickup was inadequate -- it's at least as important as the vertical. How did you model it? Roy Lewallen, W7EL Hello, and that could well be it. After using NEC-4 to model USN HF antennas in their intended operating environment one finds that the local environment often requires beaucoup more wire segments (I never completely trusted patches) to model than the antenna itself. If conductive objects in close proximity can be excited by antenna currents then they are part of the antenna. A USN example would be the 2-6 MHz twin fan-type antenna that relies heavily on induced currents in the ship's stack for its feedpoint impedance and radiation characteristics. Sincerely, and 73s from N4GGO, John Wood (Code 5550) e-mail: Naval Research Laboratory 4555 Overlook Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20375-5337 |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 12, 9:02�pm, Roy Lewallen wrote:
It sounds like the model of the pickup was inadequate -- it's at least as important as the vertical. How did you model it? Roy Lewallen, W7EL From the responses I have gotten, that is the problem, I didn't model the pickup. I wanted a simple way to determine the L I needed to get the antenna resonant. I don't think it would be worth it to try and model the truck just to get that small amount of data. By the cut and try method I have determined the inductance I need is about 70% of the value I get on EZNEC. I guess that is not too bad, gives me a starting point. Thanks for the responses. Gary N4AST |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ground gain on real ground | Antenna | |||
Ground conductivity's effect on vertical | Antenna | |||
Vertical above the ground-plane | Antenna | |||
VERTICAL GROUND RADIAL QUESTION | Antenna | |||
Ground system for a vertical antenna | Antenna |