RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Antenna (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/)
-   -   Digital TV Antenna Design (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/141007-digital-tv-antenna-design.html)

Bill Bowden February 16th 09 05:59 AM

Digital TV Antenna Design
 
Anybody have a good antenna design for the new UHF digital TV
stations?

I get reasonable results from my old VHF/UHF antenna (55% signal
strength) , but it's big and ugly, and I want to replace it with a
smaller, more efficient UHF design (maybe a Yagi) I can construct at
home.

Anybody know the dimensions of such an antenna, probabaly in the
frequency range of 400-800 Mhz ?

-Bill

Jeff Liebermann[_2_] February 16th 09 07:11 AM

Digital TV Antenna Design
 
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:59:13 -0800 (PST), Bill Bowden
wrote:

Anybody have a good antenna design for the new UHF digital TV
stations?

I get reasonable results from my old VHF/UHF antenna (55% signal
strength) , but it's big and ugly, and I want to replace it with a
smaller, more efficient UHF design (maybe a Yagi) I can construct at
home.


Rule of thumb: The bigger and uglier the antenna, the better it works.

Anybody know the dimensions of such an antenna,


Various commercial digital TV antennas:
http://www.hdtvprimer.com/ANTENNAS/comparing.html
with Eznec NEC2 files at:
http://www.hdtvprimer.com/SIMS/

probabaly in the
frequency range of 400-800 Mhz ?


There are going to be some DTV stations in the VHF range. You might
want to check the new channels for your area:
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-138A2.xls
List of frequencies:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_broadcast_television_frequencies
Note that the upper end of the UHF TV band will be channel 51 at
698Mhz.






--
Jeff Liebermann
150 Felker St #D
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

Sal M. Onella February 16th 09 08:32 AM

Digital TV Antenna Design
 

"Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:59:13 -0800 (PST), Bill Bowden
wrote:

Anybody have a good antenna design for the new UHF digital TV
stations?

I get reasonable results from my old VHF/UHF antenna (55% signal
strength) , but it's big and ugly, and I want to replace it with a
smaller, more efficient UHF design (maybe a Yagi) I can construct at
home.


Rule of thumb: The bigger and uglier the antenna, the better it works.

Anybody know the dimensions of such an antenna,


Various commercial digital TV antennas:
http://www.hdtvprimer.com/ANTENNAS/comparing.html
with Eznec NEC2 files at:
http://www.hdtvprimer.com/SIMS/

probabaly in the
frequency range of 400-800 Mhz ?


There are going to be some DTV stations in the VHF range. You might
want to check the new channels for your area:
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-138A2.xls
List of frequencies:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_A...ion_frequencie
s
Note that the upper end of the UHF TV band will be channel 51 at
698Mhz.



Many good all-channel antennas exist but the absolute best-performing
antennas are limited to covering one band, sometimes just a portion of one
band. (This idea started a lot of do-it-yourself antenna projects.)

If you determine that you have some stations on VHF and some on UHF,
consider having more than one antenna. In a home where I lived in the
pre-cable days, I had four different antennas.

Of note: The bigger the antenna, the more likely it will be highly
directional. If you expect to receive weak stations from more than one
direction, you'll probably need either a rotator or more than one antenna.
It's probably better to connect multiple antennas through an A/B switch,
rather than combining them.



Ralph E Lindberg February 16th 09 03:56 PM

Digital TV Antenna Design
 
In article ,
Jeff Liebermann wrote:

On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:59:13 -0800 (PST), Bill Bowden
wrote:

Anybody have a good antenna design for the new UHF digital TV
stations?

I get reasonable results from my old VHF/UHF antenna (55% signal
strength) , but it's big and ugly, and I want to replace it with a
smaller, more efficient UHF design (maybe a Yagi) I can construct at
home.


Rule of thumb: The bigger and uglier the antenna, the better it works.

Anybody know the dimensions of such an antenna,


Various commercial digital TV antennas:
http://www.hdtvprimer.com/ANTENNAS/comparing.html
with Eznec NEC2 files at:
http://www.hdtvprimer.com/SIMS/

probabaly in the
frequency range of 400-800 Mhz ?


There are going to be some DTV stations in the VHF range. You might
want to check the new channels for your area:
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-138A2.xls
List of frequencies:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_broadcast_television_frequencies
Note that the upper end of the UHF TV band will be channel 51 at
698Mhz.


EXACTLY, after conversion, some VHF stations will return as Digital, a
few low-band and many high-band

--
--------------------------------------------------------
Personal e-mail is the n7bsn but at amsat.org
This posting address is a spam-trap and seldom read
RV and Camping FAQ can be found at
http://www.ralphandellen.us/rv

MTV February 16th 09 06:00 PM

Digital TV Antenna Design
 
Bill Bowden wrote:
Anybody have a good antenna design for the new UHF digital TV
stations?

I get reasonable results from my old VHF/UHF antenna (55% signal
strength) , but it's big and ugly, and I want to replace it with a
smaller, more efficient UHF design (maybe a Yagi) I can construct at
home.

Anybody know the dimensions of such an antenna, probabaly in the
frequency range of 400-800 Mhz ?

-Bill


You could just cut off the long VHF elements and use them, cut to UHF
size, to extend and increase the number of director elements.

MTV

Jeff Liebermann[_2_] February 16th 09 06:08 PM

Digital TV Antenna Design
 
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 00:32:22 -0800, "Sal M. Onella"
wrote:

Many good all-channel antennas exist but the absolute best-performing
antennas are limited to covering one band, sometimes just a portion of one
band. (This idea started a lot of do-it-yourself antenna projects.)


Sure. I can always trade bandwidth for gain. If you only watch one
DTV station, a single channel antenna is a good idea, especially if
it's distant and weak. If you don't like rotators, perhaps a
collection of single channel antennas pointed at each station might be
useful. I live in the mountains where reflections are a problem for
OTA reception. For a time, I was building and selling custom single
channel TV antennas, with built in preamps. They worked great, but
when Comcast started offering $13/month for local only TV, I gave up.

If you determine that you have some stations on VHF and some on UHF,
consider having more than one antenna. In a home where I lived in the
pre-cable days, I had four different antennas.


Same here. Back in the 1970's, I lived in Israel for a while. In the
cities, everyone lived in big apartment complexes. Nobody watched the
official Israeli stations. The good programming was on the various
Arab stations, which were diverse, distant, and politically incorrect.
There was no cable TV (because the government didn't want to make it
easy to watch the Arab stations) so every apartment had its own
collection of antennas. Typical was a 3 meter pole with at least 4
yagis. Multiply that by at least 4 apartments per building and the
roof tops looked like an aluminum forest. Somewhat later, I lived in
Smog Angeles where everything is on Mt Wilson. Only one antenna
needed.

Of note: The bigger the antenna, the more likely it will be highly
directional.


http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.amateur.antenna/msg/8535c986a167ac41
"small - efficient - broadband: pick any two."
Roy Lewallen, W7EL

I've dealt with some rather monstrous log periodic directional
antennas. They cover the entire HF spectrum, but only have about 4dBi
of gain at any frequency. Directionality is about what you would
expect for a 4dBi antenna (about 80 degrees -3dB beamwidth). Just
because it's big, doesn't mean it has gain or a narrow beamwidth.

The same thing applies to TV antennas. If you compromise on the
bandwidth by reducing the number of channels it covers, then you can
get some more gain and narrower beamwidth (for a given size). That
seems to be what's happening as the highest frequency goes from 900 to
700MHz. However, that's not going to make a huge difference is size
of gain. More useful is ignoring the VHF channels and making the
antenna UHF only. That really reduces the size of the antenna or
increases the gain (for a given size antenna).

If you expect to receive weak stations from more than one
direction, you'll probably need either a rotator or more than one antenna.


True. I once was involved in building direction finders. I got
greedy and decided to find a commercial application. What the world
needed was a direction finder tied to a rotator and yagi. The yagi
would automatically rotate to the direction of the strongest signal. I
first tried it with a TV antenna and it worked. Unfortunately, my
pre-microprocessor circuitry did not have any way to distinguish
between multiple peaks in the signal strength as well as antenna side
lobes. It would often pick the wrong lobe. Making a 360 degree scan
would solve this problem, but that increased the complexity beyond
acceptable limits.

So, I decided that perhaps it might be useful for commercial two-way
radio. I installed one on a mountain top site on a UHF commercial
frequency. Useful range was dramatically increased for the repeater.
However, during a typical conversation, the antenna would rotate back
and forth between each mobile and base. Commodity antenna rotators
are not designed for near 100% duty cycle. It was also a dice toss as
to whether a mobile could be heard, depending totally on the current
antenna orientation. I could have improved things with a better and
faster motor, but didn't. I know a bad idea when I design one.

I also built an omnidirectional TV antenna designed to be hung near
the top of the local 50 meter redwood and fir trees. There was enough
vertically polarized TV signal to make it usable. However, it also
picked up reflections from every possible direction, resulting in
multiple obnoxious ghosts. Bad idea, but fun to try.

It's probably better to connect multiple antennas through an A/B switch,
rather than combining them.


Yep. If the signals from multiple antenna could just as easily cancel
as they could add. However, if you installed a band pass filter
between the antenna and the combiner, the signals from one channel
will only appear on one port, thus eliminating any chance of
cancellation. I would filter and combine.



--
Jeff Liebermann
150 Felker St #D
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

Geoffrey S. Mendelson February 16th 09 06:24 PM

Digital TV Antenna Design
 
Jeff Liebermann wrote:

Same here. Back in the 1970's, I lived in Israel for a while. In the
cities, everyone lived in big apartment complexes. Nobody watched the
official Israeli stations. The good programming was on the various
Arab stations, which were diverse, distant, and politically incorrect.
There was no cable TV (because the government didn't want to make it
easy to watch the Arab stations) so every apartment had its own
collection of antennas. Typical was a 3 meter pole with at least 4
yagis. Multiply that by at least 4 apartments per building and the
roof tops looked like an aluminum forest.


Those days are gone, we have cable TV, DBS TV and streaming video on the
Internet. In the cities the antennas remain, no one wants to pay the money
to remove them. Eventually it will be necessary to repair the roofs under them
and take them down.

We are also supposed to have digital terrestrial TV in a few months, but instead
of each station having various programs, there will be multiple channels
on the same frequency.

Geoff.
--
Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM

Cecil Moore[_2_] February 16th 09 06:32 PM

Digital TV Antenna Design
 
Jeff Liebermann wrote:
If you don't like rotators, perhaps a
collection of single channel antennas pointed at each station might be
useful.


Are the GPS coordinates for the transmitting antenna
available anywhere? I called the local TV station
and they don't know the coordinates for their
transmitting antenna.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Geoffrey S. Mendelson February 16th 09 06:49 PM

Digital TV Antenna Design
 
Cecil Moore wrote:

Are the GPS coordinates for the transmitting antenna
available anywhere? I called the local TV station
and they don't know the coordinates for their
transmitting antenna.


I'd be surprised if they gave them to you if they had them. Publishing the
exact location may be a security risk.

Geoff.

--
Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM

dave February 16th 09 07:01 PM

Digital TV Antenna Design
 
Cecil Moore wrote:
Jeff Liebermann wrote:
If you don't like rotators, perhaps a
collection of single channel antennas pointed at each station might be
useful.


Are the GPS coordinates for the transmitting antenna
available anywhere? I called the local TV station
and they don't know the coordinates for their
transmitting antenna.


I'm not sure what "GPS coordinates" means, but this site will draw you a
map and give you regular coordinates:

http://www.fccinfo.com



dave February 16th 09 07:03 PM

Digital TV Antenna Design
 
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:

Are the GPS coordinates for the transmitting antenna
available anywhere? I called the local TV station
and they don't know the coordinates for their
transmitting antenna.


I'd be surprised if they gave them to you if they had them. Publishing the
exact location may be a security risk.

Geoff.


It's totally a matter of public record. You'd have to be really
paranoid crazy to try to hide something that sends out a Megawatt homing
beacon 24/7.

dave February 16th 09 07:03 PM

Digital TV Antenna Design
 
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:

Are the GPS coordinates for the transmitting antenna
available anywhere? I called the local TV station
and they don't know the coordinates for their
transmitting antenna.


I'd be surprised if they gave them to you if they had them. Publishing the
exact location may be a security risk.

Geoff.


It's totally a matter of public record. You'd have to be really
paranoid crazy to try to hide something that sends out a Megawatt homing
beacon 24/7.

Cecil Moore[_2_] February 16th 09 08:35 PM

Digital TV Antenna Design
 
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
I'd be surprised if they gave them to you if they had them. Publishing the
exact location may be a security risk.


Then how can I aim my antenna while on top of a tower
with no one to assist me?
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Cecil Moore[_2_] February 16th 09 08:45 PM

Digital TV Antenna Design
 
dave wrote:
I'm not sure what "GPS coordinates" means, but this site will draw you a
map and give you regular coordinates:

http://www.fccinfo.com


Does one have to download Google Earth?
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Geoffrey S. Mendelson February 16th 09 09:09 PM

Digital TV Antenna Design
 
Cecil Moore wrote:
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
I'd be surprised if they gave them to you if they had them. Publishing the
exact location may be a security risk.


Then how can I aim my antenna while on top of a tower
with no one to assist me?


However a location such as" 5 miles east of town on the Interstate"
is good enough to aim the antenna, but may be obscure enough to prevent
vandalism, theft, etc.

Geoff.

--
Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM

Ian Jackson[_2_] February 16th 09 09:23 PM

Digital TV Antenna Design
 
In message , Geoffrey S.
Mendelson writes
Cecil Moore wrote:
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
I'd be surprised if they gave them to you if they had them. Publishing the
exact location may be a security risk.


Then how can I aim my antenna while on top of a tower
with no one to assist me?


However a location such as" 5 miles east of town on the Interstate"
is good enough to aim the antenna, but may be obscure enough to prevent
vandalism, theft, etc.

It's pretty hard to keep secret the location of (say) a 1000 foot TV
transmitter mast!
--
Ian

dave February 16th 09 09:32 PM

Digital TV Antenna Design
 
Cecil Moore wrote:
dave wrote:
I'm not sure what "GPS coordinates" means, but this site will draw you
a map and give you regular coordinates:

http://www.fccinfo.com


Does one have to download Google Earth?


Negative. That is one of several options but you don't have to use it
if you don't want to.

Jeff Liebermann[_2_] February 16th 09 10:27 PM

Digital TV Antenna Design
 
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:24:07 +0000 (UTC), (Geoffrey
S. Mendelson) wrote:

Jeff Liebermann wrote:

Same here. Back in the 1970's, I lived in Israel for a while. In the
cities, everyone lived in big apartment complexes. Nobody watched the
official Israeli stations. The good programming was on the various
Arab stations, which were diverse, distant, and politically incorrect.
There was no cable TV (because the government didn't want to make it
easy to watch the Arab stations) so every apartment had its own
collection of antennas. Typical was a 3 meter pole with at least 4
yagis. Multiply that by at least 4 apartments per building and the
roof tops looked like an aluminum forest.


Those days are gone, we have cable TV, DBS TV and streaming video on the
Internet. In the cities the antennas remain, no one wants to pay the money
to remove them. Eventually it will be necessary to repair the roofs under them
and take them down.


Yes, I know. The real problem with the antenna clutter is that there
was some shading of the ubiquitous solar water heaters also on the
same rooftops. While trying to repair one of the antennas, I stepped
on the glass collector and cracked it. Oops.

Incidentally, I recall that most of the roofs were poured concrete
which could probably withstand a mortar attack. I doubt if they will
require much repair.

While in Israel, I had the bright idea of starting a company to
provide cable TV. I went to the Ministry of the Post (now called
Ministry of Communications), asked about the regulatory details, and
was immediately detained as some manner of spy or subversive.
Apparently, CATV was rather unpopular with the government at the time.
I had to be rescued by my relatives. Sometime in the 1980's, Israel
established the Council for CATV and Satellite Broadcasting, who's
primary purpose was to obstruct deployment. That changed after one of
the changes of government, which suspected that there would be less
rioting in the streets, if people stayed home and watched TV.
http://www.moc.gov.il

At the time, I had been in the US 2way radio biz, so I decided that
Israel might benefit from a commercial radio company. I went back to
the Ministry of the Post, inquired about licensing, and was again
detained as a spy or something. I was again rescued by the relatives.
At the time, during essentially a war time economy, there was no
commercial radio service. That also has changed, but at the time, the
only radio communications was government, military, and ham radio.

We are also supposed to have digital terrestrial TV in a few months, but instead
of each station having various programs, there will be multiple channels
on the same frequency.


We have the same thing here. At this time (before the demise of
analog in June), TV stations are broadcasting one 6 MHz channel of
analog. They were also granted a 2nd 6Mhz channel for digital, which
carries 1 to 4 digital channels. Usually it's a clone of the analog
channel, a Spanish language version, continuous news, and something
else. For a while, one station had one channel with a DTV camera
scanning the scenery around their transmitter building. It was one of
the few things worth watching, but alas, it went away.



--
Jeff Liebermann

150 Felker St #D
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

Jeff Liebermann[_2_] February 16th 09 10:35 PM

Digital TV Antenna Design
 
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:32:51 -0600, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Are the GPS coordinates for the transmitting antenna
available anywhere? I called the local TV station
and they don't know the coordinates for their
transmitting antenna.


Sure. It's on the FCC page for the station.
Start he
http://www.fcc.gov/mb/video/tvq.html
Inscribe the call sign in the call sign box.

For example, this is the results for KNTV:
http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/tvq?list=0&facid=35280

Incidentally, I've tried to obtain transmitter locations, power line
routes, water line routes, location of telco central offices, and
other utility information from the operators at various times. After
2001, the standard answer is that it would compromise their security
if such information was disclosed. Sigh.


--
Jeff Liebermann
150 Felker St #D
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

dave February 16th 09 11:55 PM

Digital TV Antenna Design
 
Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:32:51 -0600, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Are the GPS coordinates for the transmitting antenna
available anywhere? I called the local TV station
and they don't know the coordinates for their
transmitting antenna.


Sure. It's on the FCC page for the station.
Start he
http://www.fcc.gov/mb/video/tvq.html
Inscribe the call sign in the call sign box.

For example, this is the results for KNTV:
http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/tvq?list=0&facid=35280


The Cavell Mertz web page does a much more elegant job than the FCC's:


http://www.fccinfo.com/CMDProEngine....Number=1087036

The info is identical.



Dr. Barry L. Ornitz[_2_] February 17th 09 12:14 AM

Digital TV Antenna Design
 
"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
...
Are the GPS coordinates for the transmitting antenna
available anywhere? I called the local TV station
and they don't know the coordinates for their
transmitting antenna.



They used to be able to be found in the FCC database. I recall when a
digital station in Kingsport, TN, first went on the air several years ago,
I looked up the data on location. The FCC even had the antenna pattern on
file.

--
73, Dr. Barry L. Ornitz WA4VZQ

[transpose digits to reply]


dave February 17th 09 12:39 AM

Digital TV Antenna Design
 
Dr. Barry L. Ornitz wrote:
"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
...
Are the GPS coordinates for the transmitting antenna
available anywhere? I called the local TV station
and they don't know the coordinates for their
transmitting antenna.



They used to be able to be found in the FCC database. I recall when a
digital station in Kingsport, TN, first went on the air several years
ago, I looked up the data on location. The FCC even had the antenna
pattern on file.


www.fccinfo.com will give you an aerial photo of the transmitter site.

Jeff Liebermann[_2_] February 17th 09 01:48 AM

Digital TV Antenna Design
 
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:55:39 -0800, dave wrote:

Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:32:51 -0600, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Are the GPS coordinates for the transmitting antenna
available anywhere? I called the local TV station
and they don't know the coordinates for their
transmitting antenna.


Sure. It's on the FCC page for the station.
Start he
http://www.fcc.gov/mb/video/tvq.html
Inscribe the call sign in the call sign box.

For example, this is the results for KNTV:
http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/tvq?list=0&facid=35280


The Cavell Mertz web page does a much more elegant job than the FCC's:
http://www.fccinfo.com/CMDProEngine....Number=1087036
The info is identical.


Agreed. I just noticed that they have a link to a Google Earth map of
various services:
http://www.fccinfo.com/fccinfo_google_earth.php

Oh swell... Google Earth crashed while trying to view everything at
once. Oops.

--
Jeff Liebermann
150 Felker St #D
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

Sal M. Onella February 17th 09 06:15 AM

Digital TV Antenna Design
 

"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
...

snip

Are the GPS coordinates for the transmitting antenna
available anywhere? I called the local TV station
and they don't know the coordinates for their
transmitting antenna.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com


This thread got a little tangled. If, as I think, you're asking for
coordinates for a US station, try,

http://www.fcc.gov/mb/video/tvq.html

1. Enter the call letters for a known station. KLTV might be a good one.
2. Press Enter or scroll down and click Submit Data.
3. On the following page, click the station call letters. If a station has
more than one listing, click any of them, as they all lead to the same web
page.
4. On the next page, scroll down, observing the different documents issued
by the FCC for the station. They may have a "TV" license for analog, also
have a "DT" license and/or a DT Construction Permit. KLTV has seven irons
in the fire, those busy bees.
5 Each one of the entries for a different document provides specifics for
the installation (or proposal) document. You will see ERP, transmitter
location, antenna height above ground, above average terrain and above sea
level. There are links to area maps, including a coverage map.

(For an agency that wants its licensees to toe the mark, this FCC database
is not free of errors. If the given locations are, in fact, correct, your
desired coordinates are provided to the arc-second, about 100 feet.) Here's
a quick sample:

Licensee: KLTV/KTRE LICENSE SUBSIDIARY, LLC
Service Designation: DS Special Temporary Authority (digital)

Channel: 10 192 - 198 MHz Application
File No.: BSTA-20060217AAS Facility ID number: 68540
CDBS Application ID No.: 1115172

32° 21' 6.50 " N Latitude
95° 15' 59.20" W Longitude (NAD 27)

This website accepts data query in a variety of formats. Interesting to
enter a LAT/LON and a distance (in km). The website returns all stations
within that distance. (Some may be low-power translators aimed away from
you, thus useless.)






Sal M. Onella February 17th 09 06:35 AM

Digital TV Antenna Design
 

"MTV" wrote in message
...
Bill Bowden wrote:
Anybody have a good antenna design for the new UHF digital TV
stations?

I get reasonable results from my old VHF/UHF antenna (55% signal
strength) , but it's big and ugly, and I want to replace it with a
smaller, more efficient UHF design (maybe a Yagi) I can construct at
home.

Anybody know the dimensions of such an antenna, probabaly in the
frequency range of 400-800 Mhz ?

-Bill


You could just cut off the long VHF elements and use them, cut to UHF
size, to extend and increase the number of director elements.

MTV


Yes. I have a seven foot TV parabola on my roof, but my next-best antenna
is an absolute piece of junk, literally. My neighbor was throwing out an
all-channel antenna that was blown down in a storm and badly damaged. I
clipped the connections between the UHF & VHF sections and hacksawed off the
mostly undamaged UHF section (12 directors, I think). With a section of
pipe rudely jammed into the boom as a counterweight, I'm pulling in stations
125 miles away almost as well as with the parabola.

Turning other people's discards into functional devices is an art. (I'm the
guy who worked Hawaii on 20m with 100 Watts into an extension ladder. ...
and no, I wasn't feeding it with ladder line.)

"Sal"
(KD6VKW)



Sal M. Onella February 17th 09 07:39 AM

Digital TV Antenna Design
 

"Sal M. Onella" wrote in message
...

snip

coordinates for a US station, try,

http://www.fcc.gov/mb/video/tvq.html



For many people, the Cavell Mertz site beats the pants off the FCC site I
posted.

It must use the FCC raw data, since I see it has a long-standing FCC error,
KFMB-DT on Channel 55. They moved to Channel 7 (interim) last summer.

"Sal"



dave February 17th 09 02:28 PM

Digital TV Antenna Design
 
Sal M. Onella wrote:
"Sal M. Onella" wrote in message
...

snip

coordinates for a US station, try,

http://www.fcc.gov/mb/video/tvq.html



For many people, the Cavell Mertz site beats the pants off the FCC site I
posted.

It must use the FCC raw data, since I see it has a long-standing FCC error,
KFMB-DT on Channel 55. They moved to Channel 7 (interim) last summer.

"Sal"


fccinco.com is a third party front-end for the FCC Query database. When
you submit a search Cavell Mertz submits a query to fcc.gov. There is a
little report at the bottom of the page.

Jim Kelley February 17th 09 09:14 PM

Digital TV Antenna Design
 
Ian Jackson wrote:
It's pretty hard to keep secret the location of (say) a 1000 foot TV
transmitter mast!


Not much of a T-hunting challenge, is it. :-)

ac6xg



beerbelly February 18th 09 01:39 AM

Digital TV Antenna Design
 
On Feb 15, 6:59*pm, Bill Bowden wrote:
Anybody have a good antenna design for the new UHF digital TV
stations?

I get reasonable results from my old VHF/UHF antenna (55% signal
strength) , but it's big and ugly, and I want to replace it with a
smaller, more efficient UHF design (maybe a Yagi) I can construct at
home.

Anybody know the dimensions of such an antenna, probabaly in the
frequency range of 400-800 Mhz ?

-Bill


All my antennas for DTV and analogue are Quads and Quagi antennas. A
two element Quad for channel 2 and 5 VHF(its wideband enough for
this), a three element for channel 11 VHF and a 9 element Quargi for
channel 63 UHF. Thats all the TV
stations we have here on the island. Easy and cheap to make and they
perform like hormones IMHO. My non technical wife says they and the
array looks like a Christmas tree, therefore not ugly but cute -)
Need more info... Tons on the Inet or let me know.
Chris

Bill Bowden February 18th 09 04:59 AM

Digital TV Antenna Design
 
On Feb 16, 10:35 pm, "Sal M. Onella"
wrote:
"MTV" wrote in message

...



Bill Bowden wrote:
Anybody have a good antenna design for the new UHF digital TV
stations?


I get reasonable results from my old VHF/UHF antenna (55% signal
strength) , but it's big and ugly, and I want to replace it with a
smaller, more efficient UHF design (maybe a Yagi) I can construct at
home.


Anybody know the dimensions of such an antenna, probabaly in the
frequency range of 400-800 Mhz ?


-Bill


You could just cut off the long VHF elements and use them, cut to UHF
size, to extend and increase the number of director elements.


MTV


Yes. I have a seven foot TV parabola on my roof, but my next-best antenna
is an absolute piece of junk, literally. My neighbor was throwing out an
all-channel antenna that was blown down in a storm and badly damaged. I
clipped the connections between the UHF & VHF sections and hacksawed off the
mostly undamaged UHF section (12 directors, I think). With a section of
pipe rudely jammed into the boom as a counterweight, I'm pulling in stations
125 miles away almost as well as with the parabola.

Turning other people's discards into functional devices is an art. (I'm the
guy who worked Hawaii on 20m with 100 Watts into an extension ladder. ...
and no, I wasn't feeding it with ladder line.)

"Sal"
(KD6VKW)


I found an old 5 element yagi cut for channel 52 which was used years
ago for a pay TV station called "ON TV". It has 3 (10.5 inch)
directors spaced apart 5 inches, one (12 inch) reflector and the
driven element is about 11 inches. The diameter of all elements is a
little larger than a coat hanger.

Wondering what the bandwidth would be for other UHF stations below and
above 52?

And is there an easy way to modify it for wider band?

I also need to get the high VHF band for channel 7-13, so maybe one
more reflector is needed?

-Bill


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com