Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:28:51 -0700, "Joel Koltner"
wrote: I realized awhile back that noise is the primary factor that limits how far you can transmit a signal and still recovery it successfully. (Granted, these days it's often phase noise in oscillators rather than the noise figures in amplifiers that determines this, but still.) Hi Joel, This is an antiquated consideration limited to amplitude modulation, the same specie as noise. I suppose there are noise products that fall into the phase/frequency category that lay claim to "primary factor," but that is a rather limited appeal. Deep space communications proceeds many dB below the noise floor enabled through technology that has become ubiquitous in cell phones - Spread Spectrum. I have developed pulsed measurement applications for which any single pulse has a poor S+N/N, but through repetition improves S+N/N response with the square root increase of samples taken. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Noise figure calculation | Antenna | |||
Noise Figure Measurements | Homebrew | |||
WTB: HP/Agilent 346A (or B) Noise Source for HP 8970A Noise Figure Meter | Homebrew | |||
Calculating noise figure from kTo | Homebrew | |||
Claculating noise figure from kTo | Homebrew |