Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 29, 5:09*am, Cecil Moore wrote:
Jim Kelley wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: Itot = Imax*cos(kx)*cos(wt) Noting the linear variables and constants in there, and the absence of anything that would change abruptly at certain particular values of x, what would the expression for a standing wave on a shortened coil loaded 90 degree monopole have to look like? Ideally, it would be of the form: For x = 0 to top of coil, Itot = k1*cos(k2*x)cos(wt) For x = bottom of stinger to top of stinger, Itot = k3*cos(k4*x)*cos(wt) where k1-k4 are constants Note: The above is a conceptual simplification as it ignores the current "bulge" in a real-world loading coil. It ingores almost everything about the antenna. Note that at the coil/stinger junction: Itot = k1*cos(k2*x)*cos(wt) = k3*cos(k4*x)*cos(wt) Uh, what units did you say your constants k1-k4 had again? - as required by the laws of physics. Is that supposed to automatically add credibility to any remark which preceeds it? Thusly, the nano-particles emitted by the framistat at an impedance discontinuity carry only re-reflected energy - as required by the laws of physics. It does sound impressive. 10*cos(0) = 14.14*cos(45) = 10 The above phasor has abruptly rotated its phase by 45 degrees and increased its amplitude by 41% with no violation of the laws of physics. Cecil - Mathematics is NOT a toy. :-) ac6xg |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: Yaesu FT-8100R like new dual band dual recieve | Equipment | |||
FA: HTX-204 Dual Bander! Like the ADI AT-600 | Swap | |||
DUAL not duel. DUH! | Swap | |||
Dual Band HT | Swap | |||
WTB: UHF or Dual band ham rig.. | Swap |