Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
Jim Kelley wrote: It ignores almost everything about the antenna. "Antennas", by Kraus, 3rd edition, Standing Wave Antennas Kraus on the other hand ignores almost nothing about antennas. (for ref. I'm looking at his 2nd edition.) Uh, what units did you say your constants k1-k4 had again? k1 and k3 have the units of current and are the magnitude of the two standing-wave current phasors on each side of the coil/stinger junction. k2 and k4 have the units of degrees/unit-length so when they are multiplied by x, the result is degrees. Of course, it could be radians/unit-length. So the constants in your equations for current on the segments of a coil loaded monpole a maximum current, wave number, and frequency; and the linear variables are time, and distance. Of those things, only maximum current would have any dependence at all on the nature of the antenna. How does one know what value Imax to plug-in for each segment? ac6xg |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: Yaesu FT-8100R like new dual band dual recieve | Equipment | |||
FA: HTX-204 Dual Bander! Like the ADI AT-600 | Swap | |||
DUAL not duel. DUH! | Swap | |||
Dual Band HT | Swap | |||
WTB: UHF or Dual band ham rig.. | Swap |