Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John KD5YI wrote:
If it IS true, then the point I tried to make that you are making a distributed component from a lumped one is valid. That's what caused me to object to your earlier post. There are coils for which the lumped-circuit model is valid. There are coils for which the lumped-circuit model is not valid. I am only interested in discussing coils for which the lumped-circuit model is invalid, i.e. coils that are electrically longer than 15 degrees, e.g. a large air-core 75m Texas Bugcatcher coil which measures about 40 degrees on 4 MHz. I honestly don't know if the lumped-circuit model works for 70 uH toroidal coils. I do know it doesn't work for a 75m Texas Bugcatcher coil. The people who insist on analyzing tiny toroidal coils instead of 75m Texas Bugcatcher coils are afraid of the technical truth and it's easy to see why. -- 73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: Yaesu FT-8100R like new dual band dual recieve | Equipment | |||
FA: HTX-204 Dual Bander! Like the ADI AT-600 | Swap | |||
DUAL not duel. DUH! | Swap | |||
Dual Band HT | Swap | |||
WTB: UHF or Dual band ham rig.. | Swap |