Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 7, 1:35*pm, Roy Lewallen wrote:
Michael Coslo wrote: Art Unwin wrote: I don't know about waves but my understanding is that all colors come from the mixing *of the three basic colors, or is it four? When you mix frequencies I would imagine you could arrive at all possible frequencies. *I think you should drop the idea of waves with respect to frequency. If you observe a rainbow how many basic colors are there in the mix! The visible spectrum does not include "basic colors" It pretty much has all of them. Well, not Magenta. Is magenta a color? And when you talk "basic, are you talking Cyan, Magenta, Yellow, or Red, Green, Blue. It makes a difference. In a projector isn't there just three filters required for a movie in color? One thing you have to get into your mind is the idea of basic temperature and mass without energy. That would be a black body radiator at absolute 0. It's not very simple. Except for monochromatic light sources like lasers, light of any color contains multiple spectral lines. Sunlight or, for example, an incandescent bulb or red hot electric stove element contains a continuous spectrum, or effectively an infinite number of spectral lines or "colors". So you can't duplicate these with any finite number of spectral lines. The interesting thing is that with only three spectral lines (pure monochromatic colors) you can produce light that *looks* line nearly any color of light that's really made from many spectral lines. For example, (transparent) box A can contain an incandescent bulb whose light contains an infinite number of spectral lines or "colors", box B can produce light with only three spectral lines, and you won't be able to perceive the difference by eye if they're the right colors and brightnesses. This is the trick that makes color TV and color film work. It would be pretty easy to detect the difference with some simple tests, though. For example, the light from the two would look like different colors after passing through various color filters. Or pass the lights through a prism, and you'd see many more colors in the light from the incandescent bulb than the three-color source. But you can't make all perceived colors from any set of primary colors -- various choices of primary colors give you certain ranges of colors you can mimic. RGB and CMY of particular wavelengths give wide ranges, which is why they're common, but no choice can mimic all. I notice that some color printers have more ink colors, which I assume allows an even wider range. Creating light by combining colors is a different process than filtering white light by subtracting colors or letting only certain colors through. So different primary color sets are required. It's a fascinating topic, and yet another example of how our eyes deceive us. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Further on this topic: one of the interesting things that comes up when you look into "white" LED or fluorescent lights is that they pretty much all have "holes" in their spectra. That is, the spectrum they emit isn't continuous and the same shape as with light from an incandescent source (including sunlight). The result is that some things which reflect strongly over a narrow spectral band and much less outside that band will look funny under such an LED or fluorescent light. The light reflected by the object under such a light doesn't have the "right" spectral shape. But it's something that the lamp manufacturers are paying special attention to these days, and you can find ratings on many bulbs about how good a job they do at color rendering. Cheers, Tom |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: Yaesu FT-8100R like new dual band dual recieve | Equipment | |||
FA: HTX-204 Dual Bander! Like the ADI AT-600 | Swap | |||
DUAL not duel. DUH! | Swap | |||
Dual Band HT | Swap | |||
WTB: UHF or Dual band ham rig.. | Swap |