Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote:
I have no particular knowledge or opinion on Cecil's EZNEC files, other than his rather odd take standing wave current phase shift - whatever that is. It's not my take, Jim, it is EZNEC's take. EZNEC reports current on a standing-wave antenna that closely matches the standing wave equations for current whose phase cannot be used to measure delay through a wire or through a loading coil. Both w7el and w8ji used the current on a standing wave antenna to measure phase shift and predictably, there was negligible phase shift. They erroneously attributed the lack of phase shift with a lack of delay, i.e. they assumed the proof - a well known logical fallacy. There is no relationship between phase shift and delay in the current on standing wave antennas either through the wire or through a loading coil. -- 73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: Yaesu FT-8100R like new dual band dual recieve | Equipment | |||
FA: HTX-204 Dual Bander! Like the ADI AT-600 | Swap | |||
DUAL not duel. DUH! | Swap | |||
Dual Band HT | Swap | |||
WTB: UHF or Dual band ham rig.. | Swap |