Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote:
So now you minimize the fact that you argued vehemently with everyone for endless months over your malformed ideas about how energy moves in impedance matching systems. I apologized over a year ago and changed my article. Exactly how long are you going to harass me about a poor choice of words that I used in the distant past for which I have apologized multiple times? There was nothing wrong with the ideas and concepts which have always been valid. The problem was with the definitions of the words I was using, i.e. 100% semantic. I was using definitions of "reflection" and "interference" that differ from the pure physics definitions. I have admitted it and changed all my articles. Do you want me to go to the nearest police station and confess my semantic capital offense or just go sit in the electric chair and wait? No, but an admission that for months you behaved like a horse's posterior would. I will admit to treating you the way you treat me. Whatever ad hominem label you choose for your harassing behavior is OK with me. But it is not clear why you continue that same harassment years after I have repented of my cardinal sins, been forgiven by God himself, apologized to you multiple times, and changed my articles at your urging. Do you continue to kick your poor dog after he stopped wetting the floor more than a year ago? Sure sounds like interference corresponds to (rather than causes) the redistribution of photon energy as described on the FSU web page. Yes it does. Finally. -- 73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: Yaesu FT-8100R like new dual band dual recieve | Equipment | |||
FA: HTX-204 Dual Bander! Like the ADI AT-600 | Swap | |||
DUAL not duel. DUH! | Swap | |||
Dual Band HT | Swap | |||
WTB: UHF or Dual band ham rig.. | Swap |