Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Jeff.
Thanks. Comments below. Jeff Liebermann wrote in message . .. On 17 Mar 2004 12:02:15 -0800, (John Michael Williams) wrote: However, the first radios transmitted sparks, so in principle it should be possible to transmit near a long wire separated by a small gap from ground or another wire and get a small spark. There were few spark transmitters mounted in automobiles. They were just too inefficient, big, and clumsy to be functional. Transmitters in vehicles really didn't start until tube type transmitters became popular. The problem was that the typical mobile radio used a dynamotor (motor-generator) combination to generate the necessary high voltages. With the radio and dynamotor mounted in the trunk of the vehicle, there was a good chance that gasoline fumes would accumulate in the trunk of the vehicle and be ignited by the spark from the dynamotor commutator. See the photo of the 80D at: http://www.telmore.com/ka1nvz/old_tw...ola/49-59.html The dynamotor is the black cylinder near the handle. The 140D was twice as big and heavy. Ships around the turn of the 20th century transmitted morse code by spark, I think. Back in the 1960's, my 1960 Ford Falcon had an assortment of Motorola 80D and 140D radios in the trunk. I experienced a small explosion in the trunk ignited by the dynamotor. I had filled up the gas tank at the local gas stop (for 19 cents per gallon). Warm weather caused it to expand and leak vapour into the trunk. Key the transmitter, the dynamotor starts, sparks, and boom. I then attached a 1.2 m monopole antenna to an oscilloscope. This antenna has a Schottky hot carrier diode and impedance matching resistors builtin. Lovely. A harmonic generator. Any reason you want lots of harmonics? Shottky diodes or any other non-linear device, do not belong in antenna matching circuits. It's home made, but it's probably as good as any other wire about that long. Wrong. Optimum for CB is either a 1/4 wave monopole (102 inches) or two of them to form a half wave dipole. So, first conclusion: To get even a 1 V spark would take a wire at least 9 m long, all somehow kept within 1 m of the transmitter. Thus, it appears it is not feasible to create a hazardous spark with a CB at a gas station. Find a 4 watt flourescent light. Attach a 1/4 wave antenna to your 5 watt CB radio. Transmit. Hold lamp in hand and touch the end of the 102" antenna. It will light when you talk. (Note: With AM modulation, you only get 5 watts when you yell into the microphone. Without modulation, you only get about 2.5 watts of RF). Interesting idea. I would have thought that a tube would require more V than a neon lamp to get started. I'll try it if I can find a lamp. What you seem to be suggesting is that I simply connect the lamp to the 1/4 wave receiving antenna, right? Why introduce my hand? For ground on the other lamp contact? I don't see the point of attaching a long wire to the CB, because they don't come with long bare wires. Clearly, I could get a good spark by attaching a wire to the CB batteries, and avoid all the RF stuff! Now, ask yourself what voltage is required to light the flourescent lamp. In order to get a spark, you need to generate enough voltage to ionize the air between the contacts. That's about 20KV/inch. If we eliminate the antenna, 5 watts of RF into 50 ohms will generate: P = E^2 / R E = 16v rms E(peak) = 1.4 * 16 = 22 volts The gap necessary to create an arc with 22 volts is: 22V / 20,000V/in = 0.001 inches Kinda small, but given a microscope, a 1 mil spark gap will arc. Of course the VSWR protection circuity in the transmitter will instantly shut down the transmitter when it arcs, but that takes a few millisec. 22 V is a lot more than I could get with a 1 m monopole: I only got 100 mV peak to peak. It appears my 1 m wires were too short; but, if I use a long wire, the distance from the transmitter will lower the power transfer to some of the wire, won't it? Or, I'll have to move away, into the far field--but that will also lower the power. There's no question 5 W is enough to make a spark of arbitrary size, given an inductor somewhere around, but I don't see where the 50 ohms comes from, if I'm looking for a spark caused by the RF? Notice that this is a voltage phenomenon, and is not dependent upon the power level. Therefore, an antenna that offers a voltage step-up will generate a higher voltage. However as the antenna is in the air and nowhere near a close enough ground to arc, it doesn't matter. If there's gonna be any arcing, it will be between the xmitter output and the base of the antenna. The transmitter antenna is coated with about 3 mm of rubber; I think cell phones are the same way. A spark has to come from the RF, I think. There is a BNC connector, but that implies complete shielding (even flame suppression!) at the antenna base. I have a telescoping antenna intended for a receiver that is bare metal, though. I could substitute it. The typical mobile FM transmitter of the day (1960's) cranked out between 15 and 150 watts. Most were around 75 watts. Run the calcs again for 75 watts and see if the gap is more reasonable (I'm lazy). The next question is how much heat is necessary from the arc to ignite the gasoline vapour. I'll leave that as an exercise for when I have more time to burn. Gotta get back to lying and cheating on my taxes. I think if I can see the spark, it can ignite gas vapor, provided the flame had a path out of the gap. John John Michael Williams |