Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In , Bill Sloman wrote
in part: I had to work through the equations many years ago for an experiment intended to monitor the process in which one of the "Dewar benzenes" converted itself to normal - Kekule's - benzene, which is an enormously energetic process, involving about an order of magnitude more energy per molecule than you get out of TNT and PETN. I really didn't want to blast my experimental apparatus to smithereens. When I went through the calculations with my supervisor, he pulled a very long face - the motivation for the experiment had been some unexpected flashes of light seen when a dumb organic chemist had released small drops of liquid "Dewar benzene" into a hot cell, and my calculations made it clear that the flashes of light were just thermal radiation from a hot plasma, rather than fluorsecence from from an electronically excited state of Kekule benezene, which is what my supervisor had been hoping for ... For the difference between Dewar benzene and Kekule benzene see http://www.chemsoc.org/exemplarchem/...enzenering.htm If this produces anything near 10x the energy per weight of TNT or PETN, then a version with controlled reaction rate would make one heck of a rocket propellant. I thought the ultimate energy per mass was magnesium and oxygen (or was it beryllium and oxygen?), just a few times as much energy per mass as TNT and not good like usual rocket propellants for producing gas to use as rocket exhaust. I am surely skeptical of changing one isomer of a molecule to another producing even comparable energy to, let alone more energy than decomposition of a similar or somewhat greater mass molecule of high explosive. - Don Klipstein ) |