Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004 23:00:47 +0000, John Woodgate
wrote: I read in sci.electronics.design that Jeff Liebermann wrote (in c1tr509eqipks7lt08ttt5cvnpkumu ) about 'CB Radios, Cellphones and Gasoline Vapor Ignition', on Sun, 21 Mar 2004: I didn't know that it wasn't linear. Google for Paschen's Law. For high voltages it is linear enough for calibrated spark gaps to be used as voltmeters in the past. The high- voltage terminals were open and accessible, giving a whole new meaning to the phrase 'Paschen killers'.(;-) Yep. That's it. Thanks. Haven't seen that since kollege. Also saw your comments on the topic in other usenet news articles. So much for my simplified view of ionization. Online spark gap calculator: http://www.cirris.com/testing/voltage/arc.html Minimum breakdown voltage in air at STP is about 350VDC. For RF, that would be: 350 * 0.707 = 192 Vrms Into a 50 ohm antenna at the coax connector, P = E^2 / R = 192 * 192 / 50 = 737 watts for any size spark gap. I don't know of any kilowatt cell phones around, but that's the power output needed to arc at the antenna connector. It might be somewhat lower due to the effects of RF vs DC. Also a suitably weird antenna could be fabricated to dramatically increase the voltage at some point. However, those coils are usually up in the air where they cannot get close to a ground suitable for forming a spark gap. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060 (831)421-6491 pgr (831)336-2558 home http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS |