Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Lux wrote:
But the important thing is that there's an equal number of positive and negative charges floating around there, so there's zero net charge. An possible radiated field from a negatively charged electron will be exactly matched by the opposite field from a positively charged something else. Does that mean a column of salt water could not be used as an antenna? -- 73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, http://www.w5dxp.com |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:19:09 -0500, Cecil Moore wrote:
Jim Lux wrote: But the important thing is that there's an equal number of positive and negative charges floating around there, so there's zero net charge. An possible radiated field from a negatively charged electron will be exactly matched by the opposite field from a positively charged something else. Does that mean a column of salt water could not be used as an antenna? It just means that moving the water back and forth won't cause radiation. Waves on the surface of the ocean don't make radio signals. (C'mon, Cecil. You knew the answer to your question, didn't you? ;-) ) The column of water will conduct a current, which will radiate, but I think I'd rather use copper or aluminum :-) -- Rich |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rich Griffiths wrote:
(C'mon, Cecil. You knew the answer to your question, didn't you? ;-) ) Actually, I had never thought about it. I assumed that any conductor would radiate. I've been working on a particle beam that ionizes 33 feet of air for use as an efficient mobile antenna on 40m. Have I been wasting my time? -- 73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, http://www.w5dxp.com |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cecil Moore" wrote I've been working on a particle beam that ionizes 33 feet of air for use as an efficient mobile antenna on 40m. Have I been wasting my time? Unless you can stuff that antenna into a container the size of two shoe-boxes, and achieve a 9 point something dBi gain on 160M at the same time, yeah, you're wasting time. Art's already beat you to it. And Art's antenna doesn't care one never-mind about the phase information in the standing wave current ;) good luck in the contest. Mike W5CHR Memphis |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:39:34 -0500, Cecil Moore wrote:
snip I've been working on a particle beam that ionizes 33 feet of air for use as an efficient mobile antenna on 40m. Have I been wasting my time? Wasting your time? Heavens no! That would be WAY cool! Even if it didn't work as an antenna, think how exciting it would be for birds, people watching the highway from overpasses, .... -- Rich |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... Jim Lux wrote: But the important thing is that there's an equal number of positive and negative charges floating around there, so there's zero net charge. An possible radiated field from a negatively charged electron will be exactly matched by the opposite field from a positively charged something else. Does that mean a column of salt water could not be used as an antenna? If a VEE antenna were formed of two hoses, these "elements" could be partially filled with brine and tuned by draining or adding brine. The metal fittings on the lower ends of the VEE elements would be the feedpoint. Reductio ad absurdum LXXIII, Sal |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sal M. Onella wrote:
"Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... Jim Lux wrote: But the important thing is that there's an equal number of positive and negative charges floating around there, so there's zero net charge. An possible radiated field from a negatively charged electron will be exactly matched by the opposite field from a positively charged something else. Does that mean a column of salt water could not be used as an antenna? If a VEE antenna were formed of two hoses, these "elements" could be partially filled with brine and tuned by draining or adding brine. The metal fittings on the lower ends of the VEE elements would be the feedpoint. been done, been patented too, I think. (conductive liquid as a changeable antenna element) |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Lux" wrote in message ... snip If a VEE antenna were formed of two hoses, these "elements" could be partially filled with brine and tuned by draining or adding brine. The metal fittings on the lower ends of the VEE elements would be the feedpoint. been done, been patented too, I think. (conductive liquid as a changeable antenna element) Aw, phooey! I never get to invent ANYTHING! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Electromagnetic Radiation | General | |||
Electromagnetic Radiation | Policy | |||
Electromagnetic Radiation | General | |||
Electromagnetic Radiation | Policy | |||
Electromagnetic radiation | Shortwave |