On Sep 11, 6:36*pm, "Dave" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message

...
On Sep 11, 2:37 pm, Art Unwin wrote:

On Sep 11, 1:04 pm, "Dave" wrote:

David
Forgot to mention.
Current would not be applied to the radiator itself but only to the
sheathing of homogenous particles at rest.( ie *neutrinos who are part of
the
family of Leptons but still remain as particles) This way with
opposing forces in shear which includes the bending moment or twist
of the Standard Force, the chemical adhesion is broken and the
particle is elevated to achieve a straight line projection with spin.
In this event all electrical laws lie
intact and where the resistance is solely of that of radiation to
which current is applied.

ahhhh, thank you for a good laugh art... now you can go enjoy your vacation.
i couldn't see you go without mentioning your magical levitating diamagnetic
neutrinos just one more time. *while you are gone try to figure out how my
ferromagnetic antennas happen to work so well without your diamagnetic
neutrinos to do their magical levitating and twisting for me.

Maxwells laws are all about accountability for ALL forces involved. In
non diamagnetic materials one cannot account for energy that provides
hysteresis losses.
Thus equilibrium cannot be quantisized.ie balance of vectors. If the
energy movement or decay per unit of time can be resolved then
Maxwell's laws can be modified to include losses, such that all
forces are accounted for. Until then Maxwells laws are governed by
diamagnetic materials used as radiators as they do not retain
hysteresis energy. As for "magic" one only has to play with magnets to
see evidence of elevation together with the undeniability of twist. I
welcome from you an alternative action that arises with a different
application that deviates from The Standard Model per classical
physics. As for Neutrinos,
I prefer to allude to them as particles and not Leptons which
describes particles emitted from the Sun. Unlike Cecil I cannot
explain any properties that they gain or lose or what ever on their
journey from the Sun.(Protons) Thus I am comfortable with the term
"particles" which do not suggest that "neutrinos" cannot and do not
change properties during their journey.
Especially in the light of present thinking at CERN that such
particles can penetrate to the other side of Earth when they cannot
even break the glass of a CRT which they impinge upon.