| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"christofire" wrote in message ... "Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 02:08:20 +0100, "christofire" wrote: I had understood it to be impossible on the basis of normal physics but Art Unwin's claim wasn't clear in respect of polarisation. Hi Chris, Black body radiators do qualify as Isotropic; and as Art has claimed high efficiencies for RF impracticalities, it must be for efficient Infrared emission. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC ... but are randomly polarised, and I'd expect communication between a randomly-polarised antenna and either a normal, polarised antenna or another randomly polarised one to be lossy in comparison with the unusual case. * That was meant to be 'the usual case' - I let the spell checker have its way without looking at the result! Nevertheless, the principle that heaters are highly efficient is an amusing, occasionally useful one - standby dissipation contributing to heating your house and all that. Chris |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Hustler G7-144 vs G6-144 vs dipole radiation pattern | Antenna | |||
| Radiation Pattern Measurements | Antenna | |||
| Measuring beam radiation pattern | Antenna | |||
| Vertical Radiation Pattern? | Antenna | |||
| Visualizing radiation pattern | Antenna | |||