Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 14, 3:00Â*am, Szczepan BiaĆek wrote:
U¿ytkownik "Richard Clark" napisa³ w wiadomo¶cinews:9ocqa5l6qcddd7tcrl1o4502e6s1rtq8mm @4ax.com... On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:57:22 +0200, Szczepan Bia?ek wrote: EM waves by Heaviside are transverse. Now we should check if he was right. You have confused the telegrapher's equations with propagation. Before you recite an authority, you really need to understand them. It is commonly known: "Heaviside said that mathematics was an experimental science. He organised Maxwell's mathematical work into the four equations which we now call "Maxwell's Equations". Maxwell made the model of solid ether. The four equations by Heaviside is rather "fluid analogy". "Now Heaviside had the concept of the TEM Wave, which Kelvin and Preece did not. With these two formulae, he could give a gloss of mathematical style to his assertion that, properly treated, a slab of energy current could propagate at the speed of light without distortion. This assertion had massive practical implications, but Heaviside was obstructed for decades." From:http://www.ivorcatt.com/2810.htm S* If radiation occurs at the end of a dipole ( which it does) it exists only in the near field because of its lack of spin. ie charge dissipation but without spin. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hustler G7-144 vs G6-144 vs dipole radiation pattern | Antenna | |||
Radiation Pattern Measurements | Antenna | |||
Measuring beam radiation pattern | Antenna | |||
Vertical Radiation Pattern? | Antenna | |||
Visualizing radiation pattern | Antenna |