Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 14, 11:15*am, Art Unwin wrote:
Now we have something that meets reality, where increase in current applied creates an increase in radiation... NOW ?? This has been true forever. ... and where the model is seen to be a boundary consisting of particles bound to each other! This is basically implied by Maxwell's equations as illustrated by the computer programs where radiation increase is proportional to the decrease of impedance of the energy robbing metallic radiator etc Decreasing the feedpoint impedance of an antenna to 0 +j0 ohms (if that were possible) does not maximize radiation. The first term in the antenna impedance specification in a practical antenna consists mainly of radiation resistance -- which is required in order for radiation to occur. Radiation resistance is a function of the electrical length, diameter and form of the radiator exposed to space. If it is zero then there is no radiation. Higher radiation resistances lead to higher efficiencies for the antenna SYSTEM, because then the power radiated can be much greater than what is dissipated in the relatively smaller I^2R losses of the system. RF |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hustler G7-144 vs G6-144 vs dipole radiation pattern | Antenna | |||
Radiation Pattern Measurements | Antenna | |||
Measuring beam radiation pattern | Antenna | |||
Vertical Radiation Pattern? | Antenna | |||
Visualizing radiation pattern | Antenna |