LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #21   Report Post  
Old September 15th 09, 05:51 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2008
Posts: 173
Default Spherical radiation pattern


"Art Unwin" wrote in message
...
On Sep 15, 10:58 am, "christofire" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message

...
On Sep 15, 10:24 am, "christofire" wrote:

"Art Unwin" wrote in message


- - snip - -


You still did not put a stake in the ground, just walked around the
question and then walked away. One more chance before I place you in
"unsure". Where in Maxwell's equations does it refer to "particles" or
do they have no place in his views on radiation?
What is your call sign or do you prefer to remain as a unknown?

Incorrect; I gave a positive answer to the question. My answer was based
on
normal physics and identified what must, therefore, be paraphysical or
nonsense (or both). The equations don't make any reference to particles -
as I'm sure you are aware. As to the views of Maxwell, the person, I
daresay you can make them up to your heart's content without provable
challenge.

I don't much care what category you place me in - you already know how I
categorise people who make up their own versions of physics and expect
other
to believe them ... and sadly some appear to!

My call sign, if I have one, is none of your business.

Chris


O.k. So the thread as posted in the title is now closed. On the
question on the Gauss extension this is not understood so that is also
now closed. Insults? Well they can go on for ever as this is the main
attraction for its members.


What do you think gives you the power or the right to close a thread - is
this something written in the Usenet 'code of practice'? Surely, in
practice it will continue until all aspects of discussion have reached their
conclusions and more interesting threads have appeared.

Do yourself a favour Art, visit a technical library, read and try to
understand the real physics on which radio communication has been based. If
you have problems with any of the parts that are well documented then there
will be plenty of folk here who will be willing and able to illuminate,
including some with less time on their hands than myself who don't post very
often but have extensive knowledge. I think you will find it fascinating
how intelligence can be passed between two points in space without any need
for the passage of matter between them - all puns accepted!

Chris


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hustler G7-144 vs G6-144 vs dipole radiation pattern Nate Bargmann Antenna 5 September 22nd 07 02:51 PM
Radiation Pattern Measurements Jerry Martes Antenna 0 February 19th 07 12:06 AM
Measuring beam radiation pattern Bob Freeth Antenna 0 September 12th 05 03:57 PM
Vertical Radiation Pattern? jimbo Antenna 1 July 17th 05 12:07 AM
Visualizing radiation pattern Jim Antenna 2 April 17th 05 03:59 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017