Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Szczepan Białek" wrote in message ... - - moderate-sized snip -- You are right. Few mans ago I was writting that Gauss law is enough to do antennas. Of course not this for magnetism. Static charge produces static electric field and pulsed (in the end of the antena) alternating field. It is radiation. For me there are ether vaves. For Art photons or something else. S* Which one of Gauss's two laws? Above is wrote: "Of course not this for magnetism". The electric one. S* Well that's not correct - you can't 'do antennas' with Guass's law for electric field alone. You've already been told that radiation requires acceleration and deceleration of charge, that is, alternating current, which creates a magnetic field and the strength of this field is related to the amplitude of the current by Ampere's (circuital) law, which is the basis for one of Maxwell's equations. In fact, it takes current (i.e. movement of charge) to create potential differences so, even if you are encumbered with 'electrostatic blinkers', the current comes first and is more fundamental. Chris |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hustler G7-144 vs G6-144 vs dipole radiation pattern | Antenna | |||
Radiation Pattern Measurements | Antenna | |||
Measuring beam radiation pattern | Antenna | |||
Vertical Radiation Pattern? | Antenna | |||
Visualizing radiation pattern | Antenna |