Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 15, 12:07*pm, Cecil Moore wrote:
Art Unwin wrote: ... it enables particles at rest ON radiators. As far as RF is concerned, free electron particles indeed do rest ON radiators. It's called "skin effect". -- 73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, *http://www.w5dxp.com Cecil, After all this time of taking no decision who lost itat the last minuite Skin effect refers to current flow along the aluminum. It even shows witness of this by inlaying circular grooves in its surface. This by the way is a measurement tool in non destructive measurement. This current method provides resistive impedance which signifies energy lost. You then have another component which is termed radiation resistance which points to energy applied to to create radiation by the launching of the particles. When you do your fancy playing with EZNEC you will notice that as the impedance goes down the radiation increases. It will continue to do so while the impedance goes down as a result of more current flowing outside the aluminum When you get to the point when the impedance is zero it shows that all applied current has been applied outside the aluminum which is now not carrying ANY of the applied current. WOW! You can also apply even more current of which all will still go to the external sleeve of particles to increase radiation and still no increase in current flow in the surface of aluminum, even tho the impedance may go into the negative quadrant. You also stated that applying a time varying field is an example of typical failures! No idea where that comes from. Now with reference to current flow in the particle sleeve. We had an extensive discussion as to how the circuit of a half wave vertical antenna was formed. At that time I was adamant that it must be a closed circuit and suggested that return flow was thru the centre of the antenna. Another brou har ensued with the implication was that both the upward and downward travels of the applied current was on the same skin deep surfaces! Very wierd. One of your past disagreements with the group extended beyond the 1000 posts so I am certainly not going to take on the debate mode with you. Have a happy day. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hustler G7-144 vs G6-144 vs dipole radiation pattern | Antenna | |||
Radiation Pattern Measurements | Antenna | |||
Measuring beam radiation pattern | Antenna | |||
Vertical Radiation Pattern? | Antenna | |||
Visualizing radiation pattern | Antenna |