Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 11, 6:36*pm, "Dave" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message ... On Sep 11, 2:37 pm, Art Unwin wrote: On Sep 11, 1:04 pm, "Dave" wrote: David Forgot to mention. Current would not be applied to the radiator itself but only to the sheathing of homogenous particles at rest.( ie *neutrinos who are part of the family of Leptons but still remain as particles) This way with opposing forces in shear which includes the bending moment or twist of the Standard Force, the chemical adhesion is broken and the particle is elevated to achieve a straight line projection with spin. In this event all electrical laws lie intact and where the resistance is solely of that of radiation to which current is applied. ahhhh, thank you for a good laugh art... now you can go enjoy your vacation. i couldn't see you go without mentioning your magical levitating diamagnetic neutrinos just one more time. *while you are gone try to figure out how my ferromagnetic antennas happen to work so well without your diamagnetic neutrinos to do their magical levitating and twisting for me. The problem is that all forces are not accounted for per Maxwell requirements! In your case magnetic energy remains with the radiator which is a loss that is unaccounted for ! This loss does not occur with a diamagnetic materials. Very simple my dear Watson. When you use computer programs in conformance with Maxwell's equations you can expect 100% efficiencies not the "close enough for horse shoes" type responses. If a design is planar it just cannot be 100% efficient as when all forced are accounted for. When you obtain 100% efficiencies then other surprises enter the picture which allows the use of smaller volume antennas than those known to the present state of the art. Not to be seen in books by Krauss, Balmain, Terman and others because they were not just aware of it and not that it is an error. There is no real volume restriction with respect to antennas with today's knowledge. I found that out by making a resonant directional antenna for all the TOP band that fits into my rotor on the tower. It is very rare in Classical Physics that statements made are not subject to revision by following generations who are able to climb on the shoulders of others such that hidden things can be seen when the vision of prior generations begin to dim. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hustler G7-144 vs G6-144 vs dipole radiation pattern | Antenna | |||
Radiation Pattern Measurements | Antenna | |||
Measuring beam radiation pattern | Antenna | |||
Vertical Radiation Pattern? | Antenna | |||
Visualizing radiation pattern | Antenna |