Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:13:17 +0200, Szczepan Bia?ek
wrote: All is exactly the same like in the fluids mechanics. "Exactly" makes it very, very easy to show how an analogy fails: Describe the laminar flow in terms of the Reynolds number for the interface between RF and a Biconical Antenna and the interface between RF and a thin wire Antenna. If you do not understand 1. the terms of fluid mechanics and/or 2. cannot complete this request, then your analogy has failed. I won't wait for that obvious failure. This is several steps above your pay-grade. So, you should really attempt to work on first principles rather than rummaging in the attic for impressive artifacts of science. The musty chestnuts you find would poison a dog. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Poynting Vector in Standing Waves | Antenna | |||
Standing morphing to travelling waves, and other stupid notions | Antenna | |||
Standing Waves (and Impedance) | Antenna | |||
Traveling Waves, Power Waves,..., Any Waves,... | Antenna | |||
Imaginary Standing Waves? | Antenna |