Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Fry" wrote On Sep 24, 2:35 am, Szczepan Białek wrote: I am here to collect the arguments that EM is useless. So I am interested only in troubles in explanation of antennas behaviour. Suggest that you gather, study and accurately evaluate all such relevant information before you decide whether or not "EM is useless." Maxwell was the genius Such are almost always right. He assumed that electricity is the incompressible massless fluid. But up to now nobody has isolated the pure electricity. We use only the charged bodies. The electrons are also like charged bodies. They have mass. EM was made for space. We here analyse the electrons in the conductors. If electrons are not a pure electricity when the EM is useless for conductors. Maxwell wrote the "Treatise on electricity and magnetism" not "Electrodynamics of charged bodies". It seems that EM is useless for antennas. I do not know what is in space. May be that there EM is usefull. How do you see it? S* |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Poynting Vector in Standing Waves | Antenna | |||
Standing morphing to travelling waves, and other stupid notions | Antenna | |||
Standing Waves (and Impedance) | Antenna | |||
Traveling Waves, Power Waves,..., Any Waves,... | Antenna | |||
Imaginary Standing Waves? | Antenna |