RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Antenna (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/)
-   -   Lightning Arrestors Question (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/146910-lightning-arrestors-question.html)

Robert11[_2_] September 24th 09 08:15 PM

Lightning Arrestors Question
 
Hi,

Saw a picture somewhere of an in-line lightning protector for a HF radio
receive only antenna.
Coax style.
Apparently has the typical gas tube, and when activated shorts the center
conductor to the braid.

Was wondering a bit about this.

I seem to remember in the old days, there was always a third tap on these
sort of things that you ran a solid ground to, e.g., a water pipe.

Does merely shorting to the braid provide "good" protection ?

Any thoughts would be appreciated.

Also want to ask: what about voltage surges of a few hundred volts or so
induced on an antenna lead from a nearby lightning strike perhaps
..
The levels way below what would trip a gas tube I would imagine, but still
more than enough to ruin a front end of a receiver.

How does one protect against these without breaking the bank doing so ?

Thanks,
Bob



Owen Duffy September 24th 09 08:51 PM

Lightning Arrestors Question
 
"Robert11" wrote in
:

Hi,

Saw a picture somewhere of an in-line lightning protector for a HF
radio receive only antenna.
Coax style.
Apparently has the typical gas tube, and when activated shorts the
center conductor to the braid.

Was wondering a bit about this.

I seem to remember in the old days, there was always a third tap on
these sort of things that you ran a solid ground to, e.g., a water
pipe.

Does merely shorting to the braid provide "good" protection ?

Any thoughts would be appreciated.

Also want to ask: what about voltage surges of a few hundred volts or
so induced on an antenna lead from a nearby lightning strike perhaps
.
The levels way below what would trip a gas tube I would imagine, but
still more than enough to ruin a front end of a receiver.


There are two issues, the differential impulse, and the common mode
impulse.

The shunt gas discharge tube will fire on the differential impulse
voltage, although relatively slowly, even if it includes a radioactive
isotope to assist ionisation.

More importantly perhaps is that there is likely to be a substantial
common mode current impulse and that will induce a transient voltage
gradient in your grounding system. That transient may cause potential
differences across equipment interfaces generally, possibly sufficient to
damage them. There is also a risk of injury or death to persons.

The type of suppressor you describe does precious little to deal with the
common mode current impulse. The 'third wire' assists shunting common
mode current to ground before entering the equipment room.


How does one protect against these without breaking the bank doing so
?


Disconnect antenna conductors when not in use, and do not use them unless
the probability of lighting is low?

Owen

Mike Kaliski September 24th 09 09:03 PM

Lightning Arrestors Question
 
Hi Bob,

It takes about 100 volts for the neon tube to strike. The back to back
diodes in the receiver antenna input should protect against this. The
duration of a lightning strike is so brief that insufficient heat will be
generated to destroy the diodes.
BUT
The neon or any spark gap protection device cannot protect against a direct
lightning strike, only a near miss.

Shorting the coax centre to the braid may not be good electrical practice
but will provide sufficient protection for all practical purposes against
static build up and lightning strikes within around 100 yards from your
antenna.

When at sea in the merchant navy a similar system did withstand a direct hit
while I was in the radio room. The whole room lit up with a blue glow and
there was a terrific crash from the antenna switching box as the strike
arced to the ground through the ship's superstructure. Probably helped to
have 20,000 tons of steel in contact with the ocean!

The receiver (Marconi Apollo - wadley loop tuning and digital frequency
readout on nixie tubes) blanked for about 5 seconds and then came back.
Marconi know how to build stuff in those days. :-)

Any protection is better than nothing, a spark gap (old automobile spark
plug) or small neon tube, a couple of back to back diodes and a 5 megohm or
higher resistor across the diodes to provide a static discharge path will do
the job for pennies.

Regards

Mike G0ULI

"Robert11" wrote in message
...
Hi,

Saw a picture somewhere of an in-line lightning protector for a HF radio
receive only antenna.
Coax style.
Apparently has the typical gas tube, and when activated shorts the center
conductor to the braid.

Was wondering a bit about this.

I seem to remember in the old days, there was always a third tap on these
sort of things that you ran a solid ground to, e.g., a water pipe.

Does merely shorting to the braid provide "good" protection ?

Any thoughts would be appreciated.

Also want to ask: what about voltage surges of a few hundred volts or so
induced on an antenna lead from a nearby lightning strike perhaps
.
The levels way below what would trip a gas tube I would imagine, but still
more than enough to ruin a front end of a receiver.

How does one protect against these without breaking the bank doing so ?

Thanks,
Bob



Owen Duffy September 24th 09 09:18 PM

Lightning Arrestors Question
 
"Mike Kaliski" wrote in
:

....
Any protection is better than nothing,


.... unless it lulls you into a false sense of security ...

a spark gap (old automobile
spark plug) or small neon tube, a couple of back to back diodes and a
5 megohm or higher resistor across the diodes to provide a static
discharge path will do the job for pennies.


as most of these may.

I do recall taking an early (probably the first) Collins digitally tuned
receiver to a coast radio station for evaluation. It had inverse parallel
diodes across the RF amp input for protection of the FETs and was totally
unusable as when the on-site 500kHz transmitter was keyed up, it wiped
out all of the receivers (not just this one) with broadband noise. It
took a few minutes to realise what was causing ALL of the ROs to hear the
station callsign, not as a beat note, but as noise as if it was near to
where they were listening and just needed to be tuned in. Whilst the
Collins was connected to an antenna, it caused havoc, even if powered
off!

Beware of the effects of inverse parallel diodes across the antenna.

Owen

Mike Kaliski September 25th 09 09:20 PM

Lightning Arrestors Question
 
Hi Owen,

Point taken. The standard Marconi ship station fed the receive antenna
through the back contacts of the key, so the receiver was always
disconnected whenever the transmitter was operating. I remember having to
pay about £15 extra for my CMOS TTL electronic keyer to be fitted with a
changeover relay rather than direct keying so I could use it with the
standard Marconi ship installation. Still working fine today after 34 years
of use!

I don't recall ever operating close enough to any other stations for the
diodes to cause me a problem, although I did once upset a Russian warship
when operating from Angola. My signals were apparently overloading their
equipment...

Regards

Mike G0ULI

"Owen Duffy" wrote in message
...
"Mike Kaliski" wrote in
:

...
Any protection is better than nothing,


... unless it lulls you into a false sense of security ...

a spark gap (old automobile
spark plug) or small neon tube, a couple of back to back diodes and a
5 megohm or higher resistor across the diodes to provide a static
discharge path will do the job for pennies.


as most of these may.

I do recall taking an early (probably the first) Collins digitally tuned
receiver to a coast radio station for evaluation. It had inverse parallel
diodes across the RF amp input for protection of the FETs and was totally
unusable as when the on-site 500kHz transmitter was keyed up, it wiped
out all of the receivers (not just this one) with broadband noise. It
took a few minutes to realise what was causing ALL of the ROs to hear the
station callsign, not as a beat note, but as noise as if it was near to
where they were listening and just needed to be tuned in. Whilst the
Collins was connected to an antenna, it caused havoc, even if powered
off!

Beware of the effects of inverse parallel diodes across the antenna.

Owen



Art Unwin September 26th 09 04:39 PM

Lightning Arrestors Question
 
On Sep 25, 3:20*pm, "Mike Kaliski" wrote:
Hi Owen,

Point taken. The standard Marconi ship station fed the receive antenna
through the back contacts of the key, so the receiver was always
disconnected whenever the transmitter was operating. I remember having to
pay about £15 extra for my CMOS TTL electronic keyer to be fitted with a
changeover relay rather than direct keying so I could use it with the
standard Marconi ship installation. Still working fine today after 34 years
of use!

I don't recall ever operating close enough to any other stations for the
diodes to cause me a problem, although I did once upset a Russian warship
when operating from Angola. My signals were apparently overloading their
equipment...

Regards

Mike G0ULI

"Owen Duffy" wrote in message

...

"Mike Kaliski" wrote in
:


...
Any protection is better than nothing,


... unless it lulls you into a false sense of security ...


a spark gap (old automobile
spark plug) or small neon tube, a couple of back to back diodes and a
5 megohm or higher resistor across the diodes to provide a static
discharge path will do the job for pennies.


as most of these may.


I do recall taking an early (probably the first) Collins digitally tuned
receiver to a coast radio station for evaluation. It had inverse parallel
diodes across the RF amp input for protection of the FETs and was totally
unusable as when the on-site 500kHz transmitter was keyed up, it wiped
out all of the receivers (not just this one) with broadband noise. It
took a few minutes to realise what was causing ALL of the ROs to hear the
station callsign, not as a beat note, but as noise as if it was near to
where they were listening and just needed to be tuned in. Whilst the
Collins was connected to an antenna, it caused havoc, even if powered
off!


Beware of the effects of inverse parallel diodes across the antenna.


Owen


I found that all very interesting. Mike stick around

Jeff Liebermann[_2_] September 27th 09 06:12 PM

Lightning Arrestors Question
 
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:15:01 -0400, "Robert11"
wrote:

Saw a picture somewhere of an in-line lightning protector for a HF radio
receive only antenna.
Coax style.
Apparently has the typical gas tube, and when activated shorts the center
conductor to the braid.


See:
http://www.polyphaser.com/productdata.aspx?class=coax

This is what I use on the local mountain top sites.
http://www.polyphaser.com/cms_spol_app/Translations/English/B50.pdf
Note that we don't have much lightening on the left coast, so I don't
have much history on how well it works. The one site where we did
take a nearby hit, managed to blow up some unprotected ethernet to
coax translators, and some cheap sacrificial ethernet switches.

Also, not all lightning protectors use a gas tube. I have an older
Polyphaser with ZnO ceramic elements. When hit with sufficient
energy, the ZnO expands and closes a gap. Polyphaser places 4 of
these in series from the center conductor to ground. My guess(tm), is
that when hit by lightning, one of them might stay shorted. 4 hits,
and it's totally shorted and must be replaced. However, I'm not sure.
I'll post a photo when I find it.

Was wondering a bit about this.


Articles on the subject.
http://www.polyphaser.com/technical_notes.aspx

Ham Radio protection:
http://www.polyphaser.com/cms_spol_app/techdocs/Ham%20Radio.pdf
See Pg 6 for some interesting comments on receiver protection. Quoting
in part:

Coax protectors should be units that have dc blocking on the center
pin. This serves as a high pass filtering that prevents the
lightning's low frequency energy from continuing to your equipment.
The strike energy is picked off and diverted into the ground system
in a controlled way. The dc blocking ensures the operation of the
protector regardless of the input circuitry of the equipment.

Did you know that spark gap protectors with dc continuity will not
work on receivers and shunt fed duplexers? The shunt to ground
inside a receiver (coil to ground for static draining) prevents the
low frequency lightning energy from turning on the dc continuity
protector. The coil shunts the energy to ground all right, but it
is at the wrong place. If the coil can't handle the energy (half
the coax surge energy is on the center pin), the coil will open up
and the current will translate to a large open voltage source
capable of arcing anywhere within the radio.

I seem to remember in the old days, there was always a third tap on these
sort of things that you ran a solid ground to, e.g., a water pipe.


Yep. The current needs to go somewhere to get to ground. Best
through a big fat wire ending in a good ground than through your
equipment. Incidentally, a water pipe is not a decent ground for
lightning protection.

Does merely shorting to the braid provide "good" protection ?


No. If lightning came down your coax cable and to shorted braid it
must have a path to continue to ground. Just a shorted coax will send
it through your equipment, probably through the AC power cords, and
then through the house wiring. I've seen photos of the wall blown out
when that happens. Bad idea.

Polyphaser also suggests that a DC short in the radio is inadequate:
http://www.polyphaser.com/cms_spol_app/techdocs/Built-in%20Coax.pdf

Any thoughts would be appreciated.

Also want to ask: what about voltage surges of a few hundred volts or so
induced on an antenna lead from a nearby lightning strike perhaps
.
The levels way below what would trip a gas tube I would imagine, but still
more than enough to ruin a front end of a receiver.


A high value resistor should bleed off any charges. As others have
suggested, a neon lamp and/or back to back diodes, should also work.

How does one protect against these without breaking the bank doing so ?


--
Jeff Liebermann
150 Felker St #D
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

Rick September 28th 09 03:20 PM

Lightning Arrestors Question
 

How does one protect against these without breaking the bank doing so ?


Go on Mousers web site and look at gas tubes made by Littelfuse. Go to
Littelfuses web site from the link on Mousers site and check out the specs
on gas tubes. Compare them to the specs on your $50-70 commercial lightning
arrestor.
Then note that what's in that little casting box is two coax connectors, one
capacitor and one $2-3 gas tube and you have the answer to your question.
Myth revealed.

Rick K2XT




Jeff Liebermann[_2_] September 29th 09 11:49 PM

Lightning Arrestors Question
 
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:20:29 GMT, "Rick" wrote:

How does one protect against these without breaking the bank doing so ?


Go on Mousers web site and look at gas tubes made by Littelfuse. Go to
Littelfuses web site from the link on Mousers site and check out the specs
on gas tubes. Compare them to the specs on your $50-70 commercial lightning
arrestor.
Then note that what's in that little casting box is two coax connectors, one
capacitor and one $2-3 gas tube and you have the answer to your question.
Myth revealed.


Yep.

Data sheets on the ceramic gas tubes by Littelfuse:
http://www.littelfuse.com/searchresults.html?NN=0%3aTechnology%3a157

Inside a 900Mhz cellular lightning protector. The two wires are an
interdigital bandpass filter:
http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/pics/lightning/polyphaser-02.jpg
I don't think these look like they were made by Littelfuse.

Unfinished panel:
http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/pics/lightning/panel.jpg
Mostly CATV protectors.


--
# Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
# 831-336-2558
# http://802.11junk.com
#
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS

Tom Horne[_2_] October 9th 09 02:44 AM

Lightning Arrestors Question
 
On Sep 28, 10:20*am, "Rick" wrote:
How does one protect against these without breaking the bank doing so ?


Go on Mousers web site and look at gas tubes made by Littelfuse. *Go to
Littelfuses web site from the link on Mousers site and check out the specs
on gas tubes. *Compare them to the specs on your $50-70 commercial lightning
arrestor.
Then note that what's in that little casting box is two coax connectors, one
capacitor and one $2-3 gas tube and you have the answer to your question.
Myth revealed.

Rick * K2XT


Rick or anyone else for that matter.

Can anyone suggest a strategy for reasonably safe operation of a
station when lightning is actually present in the area. The stations
located at the weather service offices are used to receive real time
weather reports from AROs. If they go off the air during lightning
events the whole network becomes useless to the weather service.
Television and radio stations continue to operate even after direct
strikes to their antennas so it must be possible to provide protection
that does not involve shutting down when lightning is present. Can
anyone draw me a written sketch of how that gets done so that I can
make a more knowledgeable decision on whether or not to try to
replicate the technique.

--
Tom Horne

mike luther October 9th 09 03:37 AM

Lightning Arrestors Question
 
Basic strategy

Tom Horne wrote:
On Sep 28, 10:20 am, "Rick" wrote:
How does one protect against these without breaking the bank doing so ?

Go on Mousers web site and look at gas tubes made by Littelfuse. Go to
Littelfuses web site from the link on Mousers site and check out the specs
on gas tubes. Compare them to the specs on your $50-70 commercial lightning
arrestor.
Then note that what's in that little casting box is two coax connectors, one
capacitor and one $2-3 gas tube and you have the answer to your question.
Myth revealed.

Rick K2XT


Rick or anyone else for that matter.

Can anyone suggest a strategy for reasonably safe operation of a
station when lightning is actually present in the area. The stations
located at the weather service offices are used to receive real time
weather reports from AROs. If they go off the air during lightning
events the whole network becomes useless to the weather service.
Television and radio stations continue to operate even after direct
strikes to their antennas so it must be possible to provide protection
that does not involve shutting down when lightning is present. Can
anyone draw me a written sketch of how that gets done so that I can
make a more knowledgeable decision on whether or not to try to
replicate the technique.

--
Tom Horne


Hi Tom. In general, remember that all lightning strike issues, from cloud to
ground or .. ground to cloud, depending on how things develop focus on on
thing. The radio wave which is produced by the affair is trying to distribute
itself over the surface of the earth in the area of the strike point.

Recall that radio waves travel over the surface of the conductor involved.
Thus, for example, the tower, pole, tree, building or whatever is the strike
point is a conductor, good or bad, which is going to be used to carry the wave
to the surface of the earth at that point. Then the wave expects to travel
outward on the surface of the earth away from the focal point of the conductor
until the energy of the wave is used up.

OK, think this way. A more or less usual lower frequency tower for an AM
station in the 500-1650Khz band is actually built so that the metal tower is
directly grounded at the earth surface. At the 1Mhz point, the tower height
for a quarter wave tower is around 250 feet high. Actually, at the bottom of
the tower there is usually a metal plate that spreads out over the surface of
the earth that is tied to the tower bottom, (Legs?). As well, for transmitter
antenna purposes, there are also a more or less standard 120 copper wires that
go out like spokes in a wagon wheel at or just below the surface of the earth
there too.

That means, very much surely, any lightning strike which hits that tower has a
WONDERFUL way to go to the surface of the earth, then spread out over the
surface away from the tower. The trick at this point is to keep the lightning
strike from going on into the radio station from there. On a quarter wave
length high tower, the conventional way to couple the transmitter to the tower
is at the base to move out a little way from the tower, go up a little way with
a separate wire, then couple the feed line to the tower via what is called a
shunt feed system. It typically has a capacitor in series with the coaxial
cable center conductor. And .. in all cases, the cable that goes back to the
station will be close to or .. even in some cases under the surface of the
earth for that run.

The lightning protector will be out at the tower and will arc or flash the
lightning bolt that might go down the feed line to the station so that it
shorts the feed line for that split second for SURE to the earth and that
collection of the metal plates and radial wires that make SURE the strike out
over the surface of the earth and NOT back toward the station. As well, there
is usually another lightning protector which does a similar job back where the
feed line goes into the station as well.

Using this technique, sure for a split second the station signal is shorted to
ground when the strike is there. But it does NOT affect the station.

Now .. fast forward to VHF TV, FM stations and HF shortwave stations. For
towers for FM or TV stations, they may be MUCH higher, But the feed lines for
the antenna or antennas on them are brought down the tower to GROUND level.
There they are also put through lightning protector devices that do the same
stunt of shunting the strike to the EARTH at the bottom of the tower. Then,
the feed lines are send back to the station at, again, a same low level which
protects them from carrying in the strike back to the station, as above.

Variations of this sort of design are also present in on-building antenna
systems that are done right to protect the equipment from strikes. One way or
another the design ALWAYS should provide a VERY GOOD electrical path from the
antenna to the earth, that is designed to have enough metal SURFACE to get the
hit down to the earth without burning the conductor up. And again, this
travels on the SURFACE of the wire, metal strip, pole or whatever.

Bottom line. You always create a really good metal surface conductor that
shunts things to the earth. And connect the feed line(s) for the antenna so
that they are isolated from this good path to ground by bonding the shielding
to the earth bound system, while providing a lightning protector to guarantee
that the hit will pop to the ground bound side on a hit, while positioning the
feed line so that it is a much less attractive path for the hit to go in to
take down the equipment at or in the building.

There are other things that are also of importance to a radio operation for
protection from power line connected strikes, as well as overhead phone line
strikes and copper wire cable system connections too. But, in general, the
same details as above are in place for them too.

My HF site gets hit at least two or three times directly every year. I operate
right through thunderstorms, whatever in contests and have for decades now on
40 and 80 meter CW. With additional protection for the equipment this site is
up 24X7 and hasn't lost a single radio, computer, modem, or ANYTHING for over
30 years now, though I also know enough to use isolation transformers and
linear power supply computer systems, plus very carefully planned relay rack RF
ground and surge protection techniques that do *NOT* use switching power supply
CD voltage operations for computers and so on.


W5WQN

--


-- Sleep well; OS2's still awake! ;)

Mike Luther

Geoffrey S. Mendelson October 9th 09 03:54 AM

Lightning Arrestors Question
 
Tom Horne wrote:
Can anyone suggest a strategy for reasonably safe operation of a
station when lightning is actually present in the area. The stations
located at the weather service offices are used to receive real time
weather reports from AROs. If they go off the air during lightning
events the whole network becomes useless to the weather service.
Television and radio stations continue to operate even after direct
strikes to their antennas so it must be possible to provide protection
that does not involve shutting down when lightning is present. Can
anyone draw me a written sketch of how that gets done so that I can
make a more knowledgeable decision on whether or not to try to
replicate the technique.


Got to polyphaser's web site, read their white papers and contact them.
Between them and Trans-Tector (they recently merged), they do antennas and
power lines for things like air traffic control centers.

Geoff.


--
Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM

Szczepan Bialek October 9th 09 07:47 AM

Lightning Arrestors Question
 

"Tom Horne" wrote
...
On Sep 28, 10:20 am, "Rick" wrote:
How does one protect against these without breaking the bank doing so ?


Go on Mousers web site and look at gas tubes made by Littelfuse. Go to

Littelfuses web site from the link on Mousers site and check out the specs
on gas tubes. Compare them to the specs on your $50-70 commercial
lightning
arrestor.
Then note that what's in that little casting box is two coax connectors,
one
capacitor and one $2-3 gas tube and you have the answer to your question.
Myth revealed.

Rick K2XT


Rick or anyone else for that matter.


Can anyone suggest a strategy for reasonably safe operation of a

station when lightning is actually present in the area. The stations
located at the weather service offices are used to receive real time
weather reports from AROs. If they go off the air during lightning
events the whole network becomes useless to the weather service.
Television and radio stations continue to operate even after direct
strikes to their antennas so it must be possible to provide protection
that does not involve shutting down when lightning is present. Can
anyone draw me a written sketch of how that gets done so that I can
make a more knowledgeable decision on whether or not to try to
replicate the technique.

Here are the two ways.

1. Provocation of lightning strikes, or
2. Eliminating of lightning strikes.

The instalation are the same only "tipping" is different. The blunt
provocate and the sharp eliminate.
Which is better I do not know.
S*




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com