On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 10:50:43 -0600, Cecil Moore
wrote:

EZNEC is only an approximation.

The Great Approximator is arguing against approximation?
Presumably because its solutions are better. But like dissatisfaction
with the weather, you only have to wait for the change:

Most people cannot measure the feedpoint
impedances of their antennas when it is over a few hundred ohms,
so a rule-of-thumb is helpful.

Ah! Back to approximations without references or (dare I say it?)
that measurement that "most" people cannot perform.

The impedance graph in the ARRL Antenna Book is helpful.

Another approximation and to this point no valid comparisons, merely
testimonial.

what are you trying to prove by picking all those nits?

And then the Great Nit-Picker finds one:

That looks like an unreasonable value

Again, testimonial sans reference or measurement.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC