Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Richard Clark
writes On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:42:05 -0500, "Dave" wrote: they said that was not such a good idea because lightning is more likely to strike a path that goes straight to ground. Hi Dave, Did they happen to mention what a great deal it was for that lightning to go directly to your radio instead? I suppose their next argument is that lightning won't strike an "insulated" antenna.... One reason for lightning conductors (and for grounding elevated conductors, like radio antennas) is that it helps to stop a high electrostatic charge from accumulating in the air immediately above them. The intention is to PREVENT a direct lightning strike, rather than conduct a strike to ground. Of course, if a direct strike DOES occur, an antenna (and even a stout lightning conductor) may be seriously damaged. -- Ian |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Antenna ground or rig ground? | Antenna | |||
Experiment With A Copper Ground Pipe Antenna -by- Gerry Vassilatos plus The Geomantic Antenna Group on YAHOO ! | Shortwave | |||
Ground Or Not To Ground Receiving Antenna In Storm ? | Antenna | |||
Antenna Ground | Antenna | |||
Antenna Ground | Antenna |