Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 23, 2:48*pm, Ian Jackson
wrote: In message , Cecil Moore writes Szczepan Białek wrote: It is a history: "In the early days of lightning conductors, I believe that the French didn't like the nasty pointy things which the British had installed. Instead, they decorated theirs with fancy balls at the top - with sometimes disastrous results. I assume a certain biased reporting of anecdotal evidence.:-) A ball at the top hat of a Tesla coil allows a greater amplitude of voltage to build up before arcing than does a point at the top. Therefo Points should result in more lightning strikes at lower voltages. Balls should result in fewer lightning strikes at lower voltages. Did you mean 'higher'? Can't think of any valid reason why either design should be able to avoid the really big one. Surely, when lightning is about, points allow an essentially continuous discharge at a low current, while balls allow the voltage to build up and up, until there is a big 'splat'? -- Ian In the end, that's about the way I see it, but I consider any discharge by either to really be fairly irrelevant. Trying to avoid strikes by discharge is like whizzing in a whirlwind. :/ The sharp point streams much easier than the ball, so the chances of streaming and connected to a down leader are much greater than with a ball which will resists streaming at those same potentials. If you had a spike next to a ball, I would think the spike would be struck most of the time. You need a good streamer going to lure a down leader. But a ball can still stream if the potential cranks up high enough, and the resulting strike can often be a a stout one if it can overcome the poor streaming of the smooth ball. Both masts should be well grounded. It's not an accident that most lightning rods have a sharp point, the same way as most flag poles have a round ball on top. One is designed to stream as well as possible in order to become a more likely target than what it protects, and the other is designed to stream poorly to resist strikes compared to the other better streaming objects near it. No streamer, no cloud to ground lightning at that point on the earth. BTW, I've got pictures of streamers. You can see them at night, and they bend and point to the down leader as it approaches the earth. The first one it can connect to forms the final path to ground, and I think this is in the last 150 yards or so if I remember right. The leader traveling in appx 150 yard or so steps through the sky. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Antenna ground or rig ground? | Antenna | |||
Experiment With A Copper Ground Pipe Antenna -by- Gerry Vassilatos plus The Geomantic Antenna Group on YAHOO ! | Shortwave | |||
Ground Or Not To Ground Receiving Antenna In Storm ? | Antenna | |||
Antenna Ground | Antenna | |||
Antenna Ground | Antenna |