Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Marc Heusser d wrote: Because of an antenna unfriendly neighborhood and limited space I am considering using a Diamond antenna either with or without radials, specifically X-50 vs SE-100. They are the same length, but the SE-100 is a "marine" antenna without radials. Nominally they both sport the same gain etc. What are the tradeoffs? Without radials it would certainly look less conspicious. In an antenna of this sort, I believe that the primary function of the radials is to act as a sort of feedline choke... they minimize any tendency of RF coming up the inside of the feedline shield to flow back down along the outside of the feedline. Such RF on the feedline can cause radiation which will disturb the pattern of the antenna to some extent. A radial-less version of the antenna has no such choking, and there might be some RF flow on the feedline as a result. This might cause a slight reduction in gain in some directions, due to changes in the antenna pattern. If there's a *lot* of RF current flow on the outside of the feedline, it might tend to couple into nearby conductors, and might (in some installations) be the cause of QRM (e.g. TVI). Is this likely to present a problem? In most installations I'd tend to doubt it. If it is, you might be able to correct it by (1) insulating the antenna from its mast, and (2) adding some sort of choke to the feedline, just below the antenna feedpoint... either wind a foot or two of the coax into a coil, or clamp a ferrite or two around the coax. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Friends of Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|