On Nov 11, 10:41*am, Bill wrote:
fromhttp://unwinantennas.com/:

"The Sun is very hot because it is burning. Burning as we know it
produces soot and other by products in abundance that when these
particles collect in the air they become visual to the eye as smoke
even tho the particles themselves are invisible to the eye unless
there is a contrast in light as with particles passing thru a shaft of
light thru a window."

Does the author not understand the difference between fusion and
combustion? Why would anyone pay attention to such an ignoramus when
he writes about antenna theory?

By all means re write it according to your own teachings. I paid for
the option of what I wrote and I assume you can do the same.
Maybe your efforts will be printed in many books as a cannon, tho
critiscism alone rarely is !

On Nov 11, 5:50*pm, Art Unwin wrote:
On Nov 11, 10:41*am, Bill wrote:

fromhttp://unwinantennas.com/:

"The Sun is very hot because it is burning. Burning as we know it
produces soot and other by products in abundance that when these
particles collect in the air they become visual to the eye as smoke
even tho the particles themselves are invisible to the eye unless
there is a contrast in light as with particles passing thru a shaft of
light thru a window."

Does the author not understand the difference between fusion and
combustion? Why would anyone pay attention to such an ignoramus when
he writes about antenna theory?

By all means re write it according to your own teachings

It is too hopeless to be rewritten.

I paid for the option of what I wrote and I assume you can do the same.

You should have paid for an editor. I would not pay to display myself
as a great ass on the internet.

Maybe your efforts will be printed in many books as a
cannon, tho critiscism alone rarely is !

You are illiterate AND ignorant. Can't you even use a dictionary?

On Nov 11, 1:12*pm, Bill wrote:
On Nov 11, 5:50*pm, Art Unwin wrote:



On Nov 11, 10:41*am, Bill wrote:

fromhttp://unwinantennas.com/:

"The Sun is very hot because it is burning. Burning as we know it
produces soot and other by products in abundance that when these
particles collect in the air they become visual to the eye as smoke
even tho the particles themselves are invisible to the eye unless
there is a contrast in light as with particles passing thru a shaft of
light thru a window."

Does the author not understand the difference between fusion and
combustion? Why would anyone pay attention to such an ignoramus when
he writes about antenna theory?

By all means re write it according to your own teachings

It is too hopeless to be rewritten.

I paid for the option of what I wrote and I assume you can do the same.

You should have paid for an editor. I would not pay to display myself
as a great ass on the internet.

Maybe your efforts will be printed in many books as a

* cannon, tho critiscism alone rarely is !

You are illiterate AND ignorant. Can't you even use a dictionary?

It is better to ask for forgiveness than requesting permission

On Nov 11, 3:12*pm, Art Unwin wrote:



It is better to ask for forgiveness than requesting permission-


http://unwinantennas.com/ appears to be gone. That is a good
start :-)

"Bill" wrote in message
...
On Nov 11, 3:12 pm, Art Unwin wrote:



It is better to ask for forgiveness than requesting permission-


http://unwinantennas.com/ appears to be gone. That is a good
start :-)


* No, it's back!

Chris

On Nov 14, 9:12*pm, "christofire" wrote:
"Bill" wrote in message

...
On Nov 11, 3:12 pm, Art Unwin wrote:



It is better to ask for forgiveness than requesting permission-

http://unwinantennas.com/appears to be gone. That is a good
start *:-)

* No, it's back!

Chris

Its true the sun runs on coal, English coal no doubt of the finest
grade.

Jimmie

On Nov 15, 3:10*am, JIMMIE wrote:
On Nov 14, 9:12*pm, "christofire" wrote:

"Bill" wrote in message

...
On Nov 11, 3:12 pm, Art Unwin wrote:

It is better to ask for forgiveness than requesting permission-

http://unwinantennas.com/appearsto be gone. That is a good
start *:-)

* No, it's back!

Chris

Its true the sun runs on coal, English coal no doubt of the finest
grade.

Jimmie

that is either poorly written satire, or a result of todays education
system... either way its 99.9% wrong... he did get the first 5 words
correct, and that English was not Einsteins native language. His
citing of Gauss's law in one of the patent claims is rather unique, as
is the inclusion of the weak force in the other... obviously a result
of too many google snippets and not enough in depth study.

Its true the sun runs on coal, English coal no doubt of the finest
grade.

Jimmie

"The world is really a flat plate supported on the back of a giant
tortoise."