Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:48:12 -0800, Jeff Liebermann
wrote: Thanks. 50 ohm coax does not make it a matching section to a 200 ohm folded dipole. Perhaps not an optimal one (which would be the geometric mean of the source/load) but an effective one - if it were designed so (I don't think it was ever intended to be one). However, the ferrite beads are a good way to simply block the reflected power from the folded dipole so that it looks like it's matched. In any case, that reflected power is lost (converted to heat) in the ferrite beads. So much for efficiency. In fact the beads won't do that at all. They see only the common mode circuit. Reflected power is going to reside in the transverse mode circuit where the beads are invisible. When I change the characteristic impedance of the model from 200 ohms to 50 ohms, the VSWR climbs to 5.5:1. Yech. (Note that the radiation efficiency is 75% with or without the mismatch). My model shows a more benign mismatch to a 72 Ohm load. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WTD: Drake SL-1800 Filter | Boatanchors | |||
Panasonic RE-1800 scanner | Scanner | |||
PCB Antenne for GSM (900/1800) | Antenna | |||
GSM patch antenna (900/1800/1900 MHz) ? | Antenna | |||
1800 Watts PEP on .555 | CB |