Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ian White GM3SEK wrote in
: http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek/misc/skin.htm This is exactly equivalent to Tom's explanation above. The detailed proof is quite mathematical but it is solidly based in classical physics - Faraday's Law and Ampere's theorem (both of which are embodied in Maxwell's equations). This derivation produces the well-known equations for current density as a function of depth, conductivity and permeability. Thanks, that linking of laws and theories will help me (and the confirmation that classical physics will be enough to describe it, as I hoped). The OP mentioned Maxwell too... so did he make some error I have yet to grasp? Other than taking pot shots at an establishment, that is... ![]() The special feature of this particular proof is that it's much more general than the ones you see in better-known textbooks - and therefore much more powerful. It shows that if RF current is flowing in/on *any* conducting surface, for *any* reason, then the skin effect will be present. That appeals to me. I think the more something can be seen to apply generally, the more it helps. Proportion can't be gauged with a model that denies it. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Faraday Cage | Shortwave | |||
Faraday Cage | Shortwave | |||
Faraday Cage | Shortwave | |||
Faraday Cage | Shortwave | |||
Faraday Cage | Shortwave |