Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:13:57 -0800, Richard Clark
wrote: On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:51:05 -0500, Registered User wrote: - good stuff from RC snipped - Either way I've learned as current varies the fields it produces will vary. If the fields vary they're not static. Too simplistic? What am I missing? Static comes in two flavors. One means "not moving." The other means high potential (which can be "not moving" AND, ironically, "moving"). Such is the legacy of electrostatic potential covering DC to Gamma. I was wondering about the latter as a possibility but couldn't find the proper words. My interpretation is although the individual fields may vary the total potential of the fields is constant. Is this correct? The difference between rods, number of rods, thickness of rods, and mesh all speak to bandwidth. 2, 3, or 4 rods will not be remarkable. 16 rods will closely approximate a cone of sheet metal (as would a grid of similar spacing). The same can be said of the rod/rods/mesh/sheet in the upper section approximating a solid disk. IIUC the current flows around the cone of a discone regardless of solid, sheet or mesh construction. This appears to be contrary to the quote above where current flows around each individual hole in the mesh. Well, language can be a barrier here when you say "around the cone." I should have said the current flows around the cone parallel to its base. - more snippage - I appreciate the clarifications and the links. It all helps to better my knowledge and understanding of these topics. Thank you |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Faraday Cage | Shortwave | |||
Faraday Cage | Shortwave | |||
Faraday Cage | Shortwave | |||
Faraday Cage | Shortwave | |||
Faraday Cage | Shortwave |