RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Antenna (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/)
-   -   Slinkey Antenna (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/148351-slinkey-antenna.html)

clyde December 2nd 09 04:01 AM

Slinkey Antenna
 
Has anyone used a slinkey antenna? I bought one and hooked it to a tree in my yard about 30 ft up. I have a Grundig Yacht Boy 400 and I clipped it to the telescopic antenna. I dont see much improvement. Live in the Wa. state, is recption real bad here or should I update and get a newer radio? this one I bought new in 91.

Thanks,

Clyde

Richard Clark December 2nd 09 06:20 AM

Slinkey Antenna
 
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 04:01:50 +0000, clyde
wrote:


Has anyone used a slinkey antenna? I bought one and hooked it to a tree
in my yard about 30 ft up. I have a Grundig Yacht Boy 400 and I clipped
it to the telescopic antenna. I dont see much improvement. Live in the
Wa. state, is recption real bad here or should I update and get a newer
radio? this one I bought new in 91.

Thanks,

Clyde


Hi Clyde,

That sounds like plenty of antenna for most SWLing - there's just not
enough sunspots to hook it too. A new radio won't fix that.

To those who are counting those sunspots (the missing ones), they have
theories about that which also involve the freemasons, ancient
astronauts, and other influences that will converge on a solution in
2012. The short explanation is that "time will tell."

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Wayne December 2nd 09 03:52 PM

Slinkey Antenna
 

"clyde" wrote in message
...

Has anyone used a slinkey antenna? I bought one and hooked it to a tree
in my yard about 30 ft up. I have a Grundig Yacht Boy 400 and I clipped
it to the telescopic antenna. I dont see much improvement. Live in the
Wa. state, is recption real bad here or should I update and get a newer
radio? this one I bought new in 91.

Thanks,

Clyde

A random length wire should work just fine for SWLing. If the receiver
noise increases when you hook up the antenna, then you aren't doing too
badly.
--Wayne



clyde December 2nd 09 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard Clark (Post 694940)
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 04:01:50 +0000, clyde
wrote:


Has anyone used a slinkey antenna? I bought one and hooked it to a tree
in my yard about 30 ft up. I have a Grundig Yacht Boy 400 and I clipped
it to the telescopic antenna. I dont see much improvement. Live in the
Wa. state, is recption real bad here or should I update and get a newer
radio? this one I bought new in 91.

Thanks,

Clyde


Hi Clyde,

That sounds like plenty of antenna for most SWLing - there's just not
enough sunspots to hook it too. A new radio won't fix that.

To those who are counting those sunspots (the missing ones), they have
theories about that which also involve the freemasons, ancient
astronauts, and other influences that will converge on a solution in
2012. The short explanation is that "time will tell."

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Hi Richard,

Thanks for the reply.

Clyde

clyde December 2nd 09 06:12 PM

Hi Wayne,

Thanks for the reply. Last night I could get nothing and tryed this morning an picked up a couple of stations. So I must be doing something right, I am going to get batteries for my radio and see if I get less static. Read somewhere that electic hookup can give you static.

have a good day,

Clyde

[email protected] December 2nd 09 08:27 PM

Slinkey Antenna
 
On Dec 2, 12:20*am, Richard Clark wrote:


To those who are counting those sunspots (the missing ones), they have
theories about that which also involve the freemasons, ancient
astronauts, and other influences that will converge on a solution in
2012. * The short explanation is that "time will tell."

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


I'd heard quirks in the solar "jet stream" so to speak..



[email protected] December 2nd 09 08:36 PM

Slinkey Antenna
 
On Dec 2, 9:52*am, "Wayne" wrote:
*If the receiver
noise increases when you hook up the antenna, then you aren't doing too
badly.
--Wayne


In a case like that, he's doing about as well as one can do, not
counting changes in pattern. For SWL, a slinky is ok. Not so hot
for transmitting though, being the antenna is almost all loading coil
with no capacitance added at the ends. Kind of like running back
to back ham sticks with no stingers on the ends. :/
It'll work, but there are better designs for short loaded dipoles.






ecregger December 2nd 09 11:21 PM

Slinkey Antenna
 

wrote in message
...
On Dec 2, 9:52 am, "Wayne" wrote:
If the receiver
noise increases when you hook up the antenna, then you aren't doing too
badly.
--Wayne


In a case like that, he's doing about as well as one can do, not
counting changes in pattern. For SWL, a slinky is ok. Not so hot
for transmitting though, being the antenna is almost all loading coil
with no capacitance added at the ends. Kind of like running back
to back ham sticks with no stingers on the ends. :/
It'll work, but there are better designs for short loaded dipoles.


Speaking of compromise antennas that work - at least somewhat - there is one
that MFJ has been selling for quite a while. Unfortunately, the model number
does not spring to mind, but it is for indoor use and consists of a remote
control box (remote from the "antenna") an over twenty foot run of coax and
a mobile looking telescopic element antenna on a mount of some kind (I
forget which type). It does work pretty well. A friend of mine owned one and
he lived in an apartment complex with a no external antenna rule. He did a
very good job of working out past the Mississippi on 40 meters with just 100
watts. He lived in New Jersey.

Ed, NM2K (yes NM5K it is me again. I got my old callsign back)







'Doc December 3rd 09 12:06 AM

Slinkey Antenna
 
This is a metal slinky, not the plastic ones?
- 'Doc

Richard Clark December 3rd 09 04:49 AM

Slinkey Antenna
 
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 12:27:12 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Dec 2, 12:20*am, Richard Clark wrote:


To those who are counting those sunspots (the missing ones), they have
theories about that which also involve the freemasons, ancient
astronauts, and other influences that will converge on a solution in
2012. * The short explanation is that "time will tell."

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


I'd heard quirks in the solar "jet stream" so to speak..

Who knows? Maybe the sunspots, like gauss/newtonian craters, got
plugged up with weak-force (feeble?) particels.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com