Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:32:24 -0600, Lostgallifreyan
wrote: You just baldly stated that no cable can fix whatever my problem might be, purely because YOU can't see what it is. Quite true. I've asked several times, as have others. So to do it once again, beyond cost: what is YOUR problem and not someone else's' that you overheard? We have your dozen or more suppositions filtered through anonymous and linked-to sources of indifferent quality that each in their own right have issues with a spectrum of cable types - but none of them have been identified as YOUR problem except in generalized, anticipated anxiety. Can you state one simple quantified characteristic you currently experience that we can offer a comment to? 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote in
: Quite true. I've asked several times, as have others. So to do it once again, beyond cost: what is YOUR problem and not someone else's' that you overheard? I've posted more than enough. If that wasn't enough to show what I wanted (I described it repeatedly in posts dating back over a month), then any more is just noise so I won't go there. One thing I will say: Most of the practical guides I read as a kid were a lot more vague than I have been, yet I was expected to learn from those. Yet now you say you can't deduce from my posts what I was trying to do? With all your knowledge to fill in gaps in what you see? Strange. I'll stop now because if what I said isn't beeing seen, I don't want to compound that by writing another word. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote:
We have your dozen or more suppositions filtered through anonymous and linked-to sources of indifferent quality that each in their own right have issues with a spectrum of cable types I read that as "suppositories" instead of suppositions, Richard. Perhaps both may be right? 8^) |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Coslo wrote in
: Richard Clark wrote: We have your dozen or more suppositions filtered through anonymous and linked-to sources of indifferent quality that each in their own right have issues with a spectrum of cable types I read that as "suppositories" instead of suppositions, Richard. Perhaps both may be right? 8^) Careful. Don't worry about mine, worry about the one you might seem to be licking. ![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lostgallifreyan wrote:
Michael Coslo wrote in : Richard Clark wrote: We have your dozen or more suppositions filtered through anonymous and linked-to sources of indifferent quality that each in their own right have issues with a spectrum of cable types I read that as "suppositories" instead of suppositions, Richard. Perhaps both may be right? 8^) Careful. Don't worry about mine, worry about the one you might seem to be licking. ![]() I've always thought those little wax bottles with the flavored water in them were kind of distasteful for the same reason. - 73 de Mike N3LI - |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Coslo wrote in
: Lostgallifreyan wrote: Michael Coslo wrote in : Richard Clark wrote: We have your dozen or more suppositions filtered through anonymous and linked-to sources of indifferent quality that each in their own right have issues with a spectrum of cable types I read that as "suppositories" instead of suppositions, Richard. Perhaps both may be right? 8^) Careful. Don't worry about mine, worry about the one you might seem to be licking. ![]() I've always thought those little wax bottles with the flavored water in them were kind of distasteful for the same reason. Ok, now I'm really lost, but never mind.. Wax bottles? Flavoured water? Don't make me regret I asked. ![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lostgallifreyan wrote:
Michael Coslo wrote in : Lostgallifreyan wrote: Michael Coslo wrote in : Richard Clark wrote: We have your dozen or more suppositions filtered through anonymous and linked-to sources of indifferent quality that each in their own right have issues with a spectrum of cable types I read that as "suppositories" instead of suppositions, Richard. Perhaps both may be right? 8^) Careful. Don't worry about mine, worry about the one you might seem to be licking. ![]() I've always thought those little wax bottles with the flavored water in them were kind of distasteful for the same reason. Ok, now I'm really lost, but never mind.. Wax bottles? Flavoured water? Don't make me regret I asked. ![]() They're about 2 and a half inches long, made of wax and look a little like the nasty things we're joking about. Kids bite the top off, and drink th esmall amount of flavored water in them. - Mike - |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Coslo wrote in
: Lostgallifreyan wrote: Michael Coslo wrote in : Lostgallifreyan wrote: Michael Coslo wrote in : Richard Clark wrote: We have your dozen or more suppositions filtered through anonymous and linked-to sources of indifferent quality that each in their own right have issues with a spectrum of cable types I read that as "suppositories" instead of suppositions, Richard. Perhaps both may be right? 8^) Careful. Don't worry about mine, worry about the one you might seem to be licking. ![]() I've always thought those little wax bottles with the flavored water in them were kind of distasteful for the same reason. Ok, now I'm really lost, but never mind.. Wax bottles? Flavoured water? Don't make me regret I asked. ![]() They're about 2 and a half inches long, made of wax and look a little like the nasty things we're joking about. Kids bite the top off, and drink th esmall amount of flavored water in them. I think I've seen something like them, though in some kind of clear pliable plastic. Usually flat and flaccid by the time I see them in the streets. Definitely unsavoury... I mean, they don't look exactly like a used condom, but the older I get, the more I wonder about some of the stuff that kids find fun to eat. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:06:05 -0500, Michael Coslo
wrote: Richard Clark wrote: We have your dozen or more suppositions filtered through anonymous and linked-to sources of indifferent quality that each in their own right have issues with a spectrum of cable types I read that as "suppositories" instead of suppositions, Richard. Perhaps both may be right? 8^) Reminds me of the old joke about the Engineer's problem with constipation: he worked it out with a slide rule. Mathematician, pencil Draftsman, compass antenna designer, gin pole ..... and so on. you get the point. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
hf shielding | Antenna | |||
shielding | Shortwave | |||
radio shielding? | Homebrew | |||
Shielding Question | Antenna | |||
Absorptive Shielding? | Homebrew |